BOERUM HILL SCHOOL FOR INTERNATIONAL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

148
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

82

27%

LEVEL 2

75

25%

LEVEL 3

84

28%

LEVEL 4

64

21%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

178
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

58

19%

LEVEL 2

62

21%

LEVEL 3

92

31%

LEVEL 4

86

29%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

65
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

36

27%

LEVEL 2

33

25%

LEVEL 3

38

28%

LEVEL 4

27

20%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

91
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

27

18%

LEVEL 2

30

20%

LEVEL 3

51

34%

LEVEL 4

40

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

83
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

46

27%

LEVEL 2

42

25%

LEVEL 3

46

27%

LEVEL 4

37

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

87
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

31

21%

LEVEL 2

32

21%

LEVEL 3

41

27%

LEVEL 4

46

31%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

16
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

4

19%

LEVEL 3

6

29%

LEVEL 4

10

48%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

15
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

2

10%

LEVEL 2

3

15%

LEVEL 3

5

25%

LEVEL 4

10

50%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

94
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

13

9%

LEVEL 2

31

22%

LEVEL 3

53

38%

LEVEL 4

41

30%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

121
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

27

18%

LEVEL 3

65

42%

LEVEL 4

56

36%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

19
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

35

49%

LEVEL 2

17

24%

LEVEL 3

15

21%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

20
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

24

41%

LEVEL 2

14

24%

LEVEL 3

12

21%

LEVEL 4

8

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

30

51%

LEVEL 2

19

32%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

5

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

24

44%

LEVEL 2

17

31%

LEVEL 3

8

15%

LEVEL 4

6

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

146
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

42

17%

LEVEL 2

66

26%

LEVEL 3

82

32%

LEVEL 4

64

25%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

168
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

38

15%

LEVEL 2

55

21%

LEVEL 3

86

33%

LEVEL 4

82

31%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

40

78%

LEVEL 2

9

18%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

20

54%

LEVEL 2

7

19%

LEVEL 3

6

16%

LEVEL 4

4

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

144
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

70

25%

LEVEL 2

68

24%

LEVEL 3

81

29%

LEVEL 4

63

22%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

175
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

50

18%

LEVEL 2

59

21%

LEVEL 3

89

31%

LEVEL 4

86

30%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

12

52%

LEVEL 2

7

30%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

8

57%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

120
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

21

11%

LEVEL 2

44

24%

LEVEL 3

67

36%

LEVEL 4

53

29%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

152
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

17

8%

LEVEL 2

41

20%

LEVEL 3

75

36%

LEVEL 4

77

37%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

61

51%

LEVEL 2

31

26%

LEVEL 3

17

14%

LEVEL 4

11

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

41

47%

LEVEL 2

21

24%

LEVEL 3

17

19%

LEVEL 4

9

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

145
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

76

26%

LEVEL 2

70

24%

LEVEL 3

82

28%

LEVEL 4

63

22%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

178
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

52

18%

LEVEL 2

57

20%

LEVEL 3

92

32%

LEVEL 4

86

30%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

6

43%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

6

55%

LEVEL 2

5

45%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.