JHS 291 ROLAND HAYES GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

27
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

160

59%

LEVEL 2

84

31%

LEVEL 3

20

7%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

45
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

165

59%

LEVEL 2

68

24%

LEVEL 3

36

13%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

5
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

74

63%

LEVEL 2

39

33%

LEVEL 3

5

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

15
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

94

64%

LEVEL 2

38

26%

LEVEL 3

12

8%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

22
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

86

56%

LEVEL 2

45

29%

LEVEL 3

15

10%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

30
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

71

54%

LEVEL 2

30

23%

LEVEL 3

24

18%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

23

59%

LEVEL 2

15

38%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

23

72%

LEVEL 2

5

16%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

23
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

135

61%

LEVEL 2

65

29%

LEVEL 3

17

8%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

38
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

141

59%

LEVEL 2

60

25%

LEVEL 3

30

13%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

26
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

114

54%

LEVEL 2

71

34%

LEVEL 3

19

9%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

42
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

113

52%

LEVEL 2

64

29%

LEVEL 3

33

15%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

46

77%

LEVEL 2

13

22%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

52

88%

LEVEL 2

4

7%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

26
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

96

50%

LEVEL 2

71

37%

LEVEL 3

19

10%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

41
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

88

48%

LEVEL 2

56

30%

LEVEL 3

33

18%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

64

82%

LEVEL 2

13

17%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

77

83%

LEVEL 2

12

13%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

6

60%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

15

79%

LEVEL 2

3

16%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

154

59%

LEVEL 2

82

31%

LEVEL 3

19

7%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

150

58%

LEVEL 2

65

25%

LEVEL 3

35

14%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

20
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

116

58%

LEVEL 2

65

32%

LEVEL 3

13

6%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

36
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

120

57%

LEVEL 2

53

25%

LEVEL 3

29

14%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

7
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

44

63%

LEVEL 2

19

27%

LEVEL 3

7

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

9
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

45

65%

LEVEL 2

15

22%

LEVEL 3

7

10%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.