Skip to Content
Main content

PS 376 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

170
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

31

12%

LEVEL 2

50

20%

LEVEL 3

59

24%

LEVEL 4

111

44%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

176
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

20

8%

LEVEL 2

53

21%

LEVEL 3

59

24%

LEVEL 4

117

47%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

84
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

14

11%

LEVEL 2

31

24%

LEVEL 3

28

22%

LEVEL 4

56

43%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

92
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

9

7%

LEVEL 2

32

24%

LEVEL 3

34

26%

LEVEL 4

58

44%

MALE

PROFICIENT

86
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

17

14%

LEVEL 2

19

16%

LEVEL 3

31

25%

LEVEL 4

55

45%

MALE

PROFICIENT

84
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

11

9%

LEVEL 2

21

18%

LEVEL 3

25

22%

LEVEL 4

59

51%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

20
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

5%

LEVEL 3

7

33%

LEVEL 4

13

62%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

7

50%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

143
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

31

14%

LEVEL 2

49

22%

LEVEL 3

50

22%

LEVEL 4

93

42%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

153
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

20

9%

LEVEL 2

49

22%

LEVEL 3

54

24%

LEVEL 4

99

45%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

162
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

16

7%

LEVEL 2

45

20%

LEVEL 3

53

24%

LEVEL 4

109

49%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

168
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

14

6%

LEVEL 2

39

18%

LEVEL 3

52

24%

LEVEL 4

116

52%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

15

54%

LEVEL 2

5

18%

LEVEL 3

6

21%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

6

21%

LEVEL 2

14

50%

LEVEL 3

7

25%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

162
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

25

11%

LEVEL 2

41

18%

LEVEL 3

53

23%

LEVEL 4

109

48%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

169
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

13

6%

LEVEL 2

49

21%

LEVEL 3

53

23%

LEVEL 4

116

50%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

8
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

6

26%

LEVEL 2

9

39%

LEVEL 3

6

26%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

7

39%

LEVEL 2

4

22%

LEVEL 3

6

33%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

9

32%

LEVEL 4

19

68%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

3

7%

LEVEL 2

1

2%

LEVEL 3

7

16%

LEVEL 4

33

75%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

142
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

31

14%

LEVEL 2

50

22%

LEVEL 3

50

22%

LEVEL 4

92

41%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

136
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

17

8%

LEVEL 2

52

25%

LEVEL 3

52

25%

LEVEL 4

84

41%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

142
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

23

11%

LEVEL 2

39

19%

LEVEL 3

49

24%

LEVEL 4

93

46%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

163
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

15

7%

LEVEL 2

47

21%

LEVEL 3

51

23%

LEVEL 4

112

50%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

28
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

8

17%

LEVEL 2

11

23%

LEVEL 3

10

21%

LEVEL 4

18

38%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

13
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

5

21%

LEVEL 2

6

25%

LEVEL 3

8

33%

LEVEL 4

5

21%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.