JHS 383 PHILIPPA SCHUYLER GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

363
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 795

LEVEL 1

174

22%

LEVEL 2

258

32%

LEVEL 3

253

32%

LEVEL 4

110

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

392
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 817

LEVEL 1

166

20%

LEVEL 2

259

32%

LEVEL 3

250

31%

LEVEL 4

142

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

195
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 419

LEVEL 1

87

21%

LEVEL 2

137

33%

LEVEL 3

139

33%

LEVEL 4

56

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

202
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 411

LEVEL 1

70

17%

LEVEL 2

139

34%

LEVEL 3

133

32%

LEVEL 4

69

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

168
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

87

23%

LEVEL 2

121

32%

LEVEL 3

114

30%

LEVEL 4

54

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

190
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 406

LEVEL 1

96

24%

LEVEL 2

120

30%

LEVEL 3

117

29%

LEVEL 4

73

18%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

3

60%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

32
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

16%

LEVEL 3

15

39%

LEVEL 4

17

45%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

39
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

7%

LEVEL 3

16

38%

LEVEL 4

23

55%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

10
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

33%

LEVEL 3

6

40%

LEVEL 4

4

27%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

11
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

8

42%

LEVEL 3

7

37%

LEVEL 4

4

21%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

118
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

63

23%

LEVEL 2

99

35%

LEVEL 3

82

29%

LEVEL 4

36

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

137
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

47

17%

LEVEL 2

96

34%

LEVEL 3

91

33%

LEVEL 4

46

16%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

196
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 451

LEVEL 1

110

24%

LEVEL 2

145

32%

LEVEL 3

147

33%

LEVEL 4

49

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

200
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 464

LEVEL 1

119

26%

LEVEL 2

145

31%

LEVEL 3

134

29%

LEVEL 4

66

14%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

362
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 711

LEVEL 1

106

15%

LEVEL 2

243

34%

LEVEL 3

252

35%

LEVEL 4

110

15%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

388
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 734

LEVEL 1

95

13%

LEVEL 2

251

34%

LEVEL 3

247

34%

LEVEL 4

141

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

68

81%

LEVEL 2

15

18%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

71

86%

LEVEL 2

8

10%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

363
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 759

LEVEL 1

141

19%

LEVEL 2

255

34%

LEVEL 3

253

33%

LEVEL 4

110

14%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

392
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 775

LEVEL 1

125

16%

LEVEL 2

258

33%

LEVEL 3

250

32%

LEVEL 4

142

18%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

33

92%

LEVEL 2

3

8%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

41

98%

LEVEL 2

1

2%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

66
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

18

14%

LEVEL 2

49

37%

LEVEL 3

45

34%

LEVEL 4

21

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

20

13%

LEVEL 2

47

31%

LEVEL 3

59

39%

LEVEL 4

24

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

297
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 662

LEVEL 1

156

24%

LEVEL 2

209

32%

LEVEL 3

208

31%

LEVEL 4

89

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

309
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 667

LEVEL 1

146

22%

LEVEL 2

212

32%

LEVEL 3

191

29%

LEVEL 4

118

18%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

353
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 773

LEVEL 1

170

22%

LEVEL 2

250

32%

LEVEL 3

247

32%

LEVEL 4

106

14%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

380
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 792

LEVEL 1

162

20%

LEVEL 2

250

32%

LEVEL 3

243

31%

LEVEL 4

137

17%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

10
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

4

18%

LEVEL 2

8

36%

LEVEL 3

6

27%

LEVEL 4

4

18%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

12
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

4

16%

LEVEL 2

9

36%

LEVEL 3

7

28%

LEVEL 4

5

20%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.