Skip to Content
Main content

PS 123 SUYDAM GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

98
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

124

41%

LEVEL 2

81

27%

LEVEL 3

73

24%

LEVEL 4

25

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

95
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

111

38%

LEVEL 2

87

30%

LEVEL 3

64

22%

LEVEL 4

31

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

45
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

81

50%

LEVEL 2

36

22%

LEVEL 3

34

21%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

47
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

60

39%

LEVEL 2

46

30%

LEVEL 3

32

21%

LEVEL 4

15

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

53
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

43

30%

LEVEL 2

45

32%

LEVEL 3

39

28%

LEVEL 4

14

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

48
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

51

36%

LEVEL 2

41

29%

LEVEL 3

32

23%

LEVEL 4

16

11%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

5

36%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

3

21%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

4

27%

LEVEL 2

5

33%

LEVEL 3

4

27%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

87
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

115

42%

LEVEL 2

71

26%

LEVEL 3

67

25%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

82
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

98

38%

LEVEL 2

79

31%

LEVEL 3

55

21%

LEVEL 4

27

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

92
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

97

37%

LEVEL 2

71

27%

LEVEL 3

68

26%

LEVEL 4

24

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

89
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

86

34%

LEVEL 2

77

31%

LEVEL 3

60

24%

LEVEL 4

29

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

27

63%

LEVEL 2

10

23%

LEVEL 3

5

12%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

25

61%

LEVEL 2

10

24%

LEVEL 3

4

10%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

74
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

83

38%

LEVEL 2

63

29%

LEVEL 3

55

25%

LEVEL 4

19

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

86
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

60

28%

LEVEL 2

65

31%

LEVEL 3

55

26%

LEVEL 4

31

15%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

24
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

41

49%

LEVEL 2

18

22%

LEVEL 3

18

22%

LEVEL 4

6

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

9
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

51

62%

LEVEL 2

22

27%

LEVEL 3

9

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

5

63%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

7

35%

LEVEL 2

4

20%

LEVEL 3

3

15%

LEVEL 4

6

30%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

93
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

122

41%

LEVEL 2

80

27%

LEVEL 3

68

23%

LEVEL 4

25

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

86
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

104

38%

LEVEL 2

83

30%

LEVEL 3

61

22%

LEVEL 4

25

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

81
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

100

39%

LEVEL 2

74

29%

LEVEL 3

59

23%

LEVEL 4

22

9%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

89
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

97

37%

LEVEL 2

79

30%

LEVEL 3

59

22%

LEVEL 4

30

11%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

17
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

24

50%

LEVEL 2

7

15%

LEVEL 3

14

29%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

14

50%

LEVEL 2

8

29%

LEVEL 3

5

18%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.