Skip to Content
Main content

PS 156 WAVERLY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

70
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

179

53%

LEVEL 2

86

26%

LEVEL 3

40

12%

LEVEL 4

30

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

93
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

121

43%

LEVEL 2

66

24%

LEVEL 3

53

19%

LEVEL 4

40

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

27
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

85

55%

LEVEL 2

43

28%

LEVEL 3

16

10%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

43
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

59

46%

LEVEL 2

27

21%

LEVEL 3

25

19%

LEVEL 4

18

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

43
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

94

52%

LEVEL 2

43

24%

LEVEL 3

24

13%

LEVEL 4

19

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

50
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

62

41%

LEVEL 2

39

26%

LEVEL 3

28

19%

LEVEL 4

22

15%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

59
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

138

53%

LEVEL 2

65

25%

LEVEL 3

33

13%

LEVEL 4

26

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

77
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

97

43%

LEVEL 2

51

23%

LEVEL 3

41

18%

LEVEL 4

36

16%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

36

56%

LEVEL 2

17

27%

LEVEL 3

7

11%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

23

47%

LEVEL 2

12

24%

LEVEL 3

10

20%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

66
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

114

44%

LEVEL 2

78

30%

LEVEL 3

37

14%

LEVEL 4

29

11%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

86
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

75

35%

LEVEL 2

53

25%

LEVEL 3

49

23%

LEVEL 4

37

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

65

84%

LEVEL 2

8

10%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

46

70%

LEVEL 2

13

20%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

70
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

174

53%

LEVEL 2

85

26%

LEVEL 3

40

12%

LEVEL 4

30

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

92
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

118

43%

LEVEL 2

63

23%

LEVEL 3

52

19%

LEVEL 4

40

15%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

5

83%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

15

54%

LEVEL 2

7

25%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

5

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

6

27%

LEVEL 2

6

27%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

7

32%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

64
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

164

53%

LEVEL 2

79

26%

LEVEL 3

39

13%

LEVEL 4

25

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

115

45%

LEVEL 2

60

23%

LEVEL 3

50

19%

LEVEL 4

33

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

57
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

138

51%

LEVEL 2

73

27%

LEVEL 3

33

12%

LEVEL 4

24

9%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

83
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

98

42%

LEVEL 2

54

23%

LEVEL 3

46

20%

LEVEL 4

37

16%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

13
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

41

61%

LEVEL 2

13

19%

LEVEL 3

7

10%

LEVEL 4

6

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

10
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

23

51%

LEVEL 2

12

27%

LEVEL 3

7

16%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.