Skip to Content
Main content

PS 41 FRANCIS WHITE GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

52
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

161

52%

LEVEL 2

96

31%

LEVEL 3

43

14%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

58
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

125

46%

LEVEL 2

86

32%

LEVEL 3

39

14%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

28
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

76

48%

LEVEL 2

55

35%

LEVEL 3

22

14%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

27
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

57

45%

LEVEL 2

44

34%

LEVEL 3

18

14%

LEVEL 4

9

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

24
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

85

57%

LEVEL 2

41

27%

LEVEL 3

21

14%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

31
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

68

48%

LEVEL 2

42

30%

LEVEL 3

21

15%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

30
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

108

55%

LEVEL 2

59

30%

LEVEL 3

24

12%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

30
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

84

51%

LEVEL 2

50

30%

LEVEL 3

21

13%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

43

46%

LEVEL 2

33

35%

LEVEL 3

16

17%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

19
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

37

42%

LEVEL 2

33

37%

LEVEL 3

11

12%

LEVEL 4

8

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

46
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

89

42%

LEVEL 2

77

36%

LEVEL 3

37

17%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

56
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

67

35%

LEVEL 2

68

36%

LEVEL 3

37

19%

LEVEL 4

19

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

72

74%

LEVEL 2

19

20%

LEVEL 3

6

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

58

74%

LEVEL 2

18

23%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

50
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

143

51%

LEVEL 2

88

31%

LEVEL 3

42

15%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

55
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

116

46%

LEVEL 2

82

32%

LEVEL 3

37

15%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

18

64%

LEVEL 2

8

29%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

9

56%

LEVEL 2

4

25%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

6

50%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

119

46%

LEVEL 2

81

32%

LEVEL 3

39

15%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

47
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

126

49%

LEVEL 2

82

32%

LEVEL 3

38

15%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

50
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

102

46%

LEVEL 2

69

31%

LEVEL 3

33

15%

LEVEL 4

17

8%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

35

65%

LEVEL 2

14

26%

LEVEL 3

5

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

8
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

23

48%

LEVEL 2

17

35%

LEVEL 3

6

13%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.