PS 251 PAERDEGAT GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

58
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

101

45%

LEVEL 2

66

29%

LEVEL 3

45

20%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

44
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

104

46%

LEVEL 2

79

35%

LEVEL 3

31

14%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

28
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

62

50%

LEVEL 2

33

27%

LEVEL 3

21

17%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

20
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

57

48%

LEVEL 2

42

35%

LEVEL 3

14

12%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

30
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

39

38%

LEVEL 2

33

32%

LEVEL 3

24

24%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

24
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

47

44%

LEVEL 2

37

34%

LEVEL 3

17

16%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

6

67%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

7

58%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

45
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

72

42%

LEVEL 2

55

32%

LEVEL 3

35

20%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

36
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

74

43%

LEVEL 2

62

36%

LEVEL 3

25

15%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

18

55%

LEVEL 2

7

21%

LEVEL 3

7

21%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

17

52%

LEVEL 2

13

39%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

52
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

71

39%

LEVEL 2

57

32%

LEVEL 3

39

22%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

41
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

82

46%

LEVEL 2

55

31%

LEVEL 3

28

16%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

30

67%

LEVEL 2

9

20%

LEVEL 3

6

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

22

45%

LEVEL 2

24

49%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

56
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

87

42%

LEVEL 2

66

32%

LEVEL 3

43

21%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

44
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

88

42%

LEVEL 2

76

37%

LEVEL 3

31

15%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

14

88%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

16

84%

LEVEL 2

3

16%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

24

36%

LEVEL 2

20

30%

LEVEL 3

19

28%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

16

31%

LEVEL 2

22

43%

LEVEL 3

7

14%

LEVEL 4

6

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

77

49%

LEVEL 2

46

29%

LEVEL 3

26

16%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

88

50%

LEVEL 2

57

32%

LEVEL 3

24

14%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

54
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

88

43%

LEVEL 2

61

30%

LEVEL 3

41

20%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

41
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

91

45%

LEVEL 2

70

35%

LEVEL 3

29

14%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

13

59%

LEVEL 2

5

23%

LEVEL 3

4

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

13

52%

LEVEL 2

9

36%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.