Skip to Content
Main content

PS 255 BARBARA REING SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

264
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 442

LEVEL 1

72

16%

LEVEL 2

106

24%

LEVEL 3

125

28%

LEVEL 4

139

31%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

292
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 430

LEVEL 1

46

11%

LEVEL 2

92

21%

LEVEL 3

133

31%

LEVEL 4

159

37%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

124
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

36

17%

LEVEL 2

48

23%

LEVEL 3

60

29%

LEVEL 4

64

31%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

135
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

26

12%

LEVEL 2

50

24%

LEVEL 3

64

30%

LEVEL 4

71

34%

MALE

PROFICIENT

140
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

36

15%

LEVEL 2

58

25%

LEVEL 3

65

28%

LEVEL 4

75

32%

MALE

PROFICIENT

157
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

20

9%

LEVEL 2

42

19%

LEVEL 3

69

32%

LEVEL 4

88

40%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

62
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

17

18%

LEVEL 2

18

19%

LEVEL 3

24

25%

LEVEL 4

38

39%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

67
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

4

4%

LEVEL 2

26

27%

LEVEL 3

26

27%

LEVEL 4

41

42%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

175
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

37

13%

LEVEL 2

70

25%

LEVEL 3

90

32%

LEVEL 4

85

30%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

197
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

33

12%

LEVEL 2

46

17%

LEVEL 3

88

32%

LEVEL 4

109

39%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

21
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

14

29%

LEVEL 2

14

29%

LEVEL 3

11

22%

LEVEL 4

10

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

21
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

7

16%

LEVEL 2

17

38%

LEVEL 3

14

31%

LEVEL 4

7

16%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

234
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 378

LEVEL 1

54

14%

LEVEL 2

90

24%

LEVEL 3

108

29%

LEVEL 4

126

33%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

260
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

34

9%

LEVEL 2

78

21%

LEVEL 3

118

32%

LEVEL 4

142

38%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

30
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

18

28%

LEVEL 2

16

25%

LEVEL 3

17

27%

LEVEL 4

13

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

32
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

12

21%

LEVEL 2

14

24%

LEVEL 3

15

26%

LEVEL 4

17

29%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

242
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

42

11%

LEVEL 2

82

22%

LEVEL 3

111

30%

LEVEL 4

131

36%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

260
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

34

9%

LEVEL 2

72

20%

LEVEL 3

111

30%

LEVEL 4

149

41%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

22
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

30

39%

LEVEL 2

24

32%

LEVEL 3

14

18%

LEVEL 4

8

11%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

32
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

12

19%

LEVEL 2

20

31%

LEVEL 3

22

34%

LEVEL 4

10

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

82
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

5

5%

LEVEL 2

14

14%

LEVEL 3

27

27%

LEVEL 4

55

54%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

76
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

5

5%

LEVEL 2

16

16%

LEVEL 3

24

25%

LEVEL 4

52

54%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

182
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

67

20%

LEVEL 2

92

27%

LEVEL 3

98

29%

LEVEL 4

84

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

216
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

41

12%

LEVEL 2

76

23%

LEVEL 3

109

33%

LEVEL 4

107

32%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

248
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 397

LEVEL 1

64

16%

LEVEL 2

85

21%

LEVEL 3

113

28%

LEVEL 4

135

34%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

267
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 381

LEVEL 1

36

9%

LEVEL 2

78

20%

LEVEL 3

118

31%

LEVEL 4

149

39%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

16
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

8

18%

LEVEL 2

21

47%

LEVEL 3

12

27%

LEVEL 4

4

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

25
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

10

20%

LEVEL 2

14

29%

LEVEL 3

15

31%

LEVEL 4

10

20%

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.