ANDRIES HUDDE GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

183
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 714

LEVEL 1

333

47%

LEVEL 2

198

28%

LEVEL 3

115

16%

LEVEL 4

68

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

151
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 656

LEVEL 1

331

50%

LEVEL 2

174

27%

LEVEL 3

98

15%

LEVEL 4

53

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

100
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

156

43%

LEVEL 2

104

29%

LEVEL 3

63

18%

LEVEL 4

37

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

80
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

160

51%

LEVEL 2

72

23%

LEVEL 3

48

15%

LEVEL 4

32

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

83
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

177

50%

LEVEL 2

94

27%

LEVEL 3

52

15%

LEVEL 4

31

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

71
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

171

50%

LEVEL 2

102

30%

LEVEL 3

50

15%

LEVEL 4

21

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

67
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

38

27%

LEVEL 2

36

26%

LEVEL 3

31

22%

LEVEL 4

36

26%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

49
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

35

31%

LEVEL 2

30

26%

LEVEL 3

25

22%

LEVEL 4

24

21%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

16
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

37

57%

LEVEL 2

12

18%

LEVEL 3

12

18%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

13
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

30

52%

LEVEL 2

15

26%

LEVEL 3

7

12%

LEVEL 4

6

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

82
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 406

LEVEL 1

205

50%

LEVEL 2

119

29%

LEVEL 3

62

15%

LEVEL 4

20

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

70
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

206

55%

LEVEL 2

99

26%

LEVEL 3

56

15%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

49

54%

LEVEL 2

27

30%

LEVEL 3

8

9%

LEVEL 4

7

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

55

56%

LEVEL 2

28

28%

LEVEL 3

9

9%

LEVEL 4

7

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

180
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 607

LEVEL 1

248

41%

LEVEL 2

179

29%

LEVEL 3

112

18%

LEVEL 4

68

11%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

147
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 536

LEVEL 1

235

44%

LEVEL 2

154

29%

LEVEL 3

94

18%

LEVEL 4

53

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

85

79%

LEVEL 2

19

18%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

96

80%

LEVEL 2

20

17%

LEVEL 3

4

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

174
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 610

LEVEL 1

253

41%

LEVEL 2

183

30%

LEVEL 3

108

18%

LEVEL 4

66

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

146
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 541

LEVEL 1

237

44%

LEVEL 2

158

29%

LEVEL 3

95

18%

LEVEL 4

51

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

9
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

80

77%

LEVEL 2

15

14%

LEVEL 3

7

7%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

5
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

94

82%

LEVEL 2

16

14%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

40

43%

LEVEL 2

23

25%

LEVEL 3

19

20%

LEVEL 4

11

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

50

44%

LEVEL 2

31

27%

LEVEL 3

19

17%

LEVEL 4

13

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

153
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 621

LEVEL 1

293

47%

LEVEL 2

175

28%

LEVEL 3

96

15%

LEVEL 4

57

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

119
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 543

LEVEL 1

281

52%

LEVEL 2

143

26%

LEVEL 3

79

15%

LEVEL 4

40

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

175
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 648

LEVEL 1

291

45%

LEVEL 2

182

28%

LEVEL 3

110

17%

LEVEL 4

65

10%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

145
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 587

LEVEL 1

285

49%

LEVEL 2

157

27%

LEVEL 3

92

16%

LEVEL 4

53

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

8
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

42

64%

LEVEL 2

16

24%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

46

67%

LEVEL 2

17

25%

LEVEL 3

6

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.