PS 312 BERGEN BEACH GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

231
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 374

LEVEL 1

41

11%

LEVEL 2

102

27%

LEVEL 3

116

31%

LEVEL 4

115

31%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

226
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

43

11%

LEVEL 2

106

28%

LEVEL 3

103

27%

LEVEL 4

123

33%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

99
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

20

12%

LEVEL 2

53

31%

LEVEL 3

53

31%

LEVEL 4

46

27%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

111
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

27

14%

LEVEL 2

50

27%

LEVEL 3

50

27%

LEVEL 4

61

32%

MALE

PROFICIENT

132
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

21

10%

LEVEL 2

49

24%

LEVEL 3

63

31%

LEVEL 4

69

34%

MALE

PROFICIENT

115
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

16

9%

LEVEL 2

56

30%

LEVEL 3

53

28%

LEVEL 4

62

33%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

10
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

8

62%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

11
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

2

14%

LEVEL 2

1

7%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

7

50%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

124
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

14

8%

LEVEL 2

35

20%

LEVEL 3

53

31%

LEVEL 4

71

41%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

112
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

17

10%

LEVEL 2

33

20%

LEVEL 3

40

25%

LEVEL 4

72

44%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

65
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

22

15%

LEVEL 2

57

40%

LEVEL 3

40

28%

LEVEL 4

25

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

76
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

18

12%

LEVEL 2

55

37%

LEVEL 3

40

27%

LEVEL 4

36

24%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

25
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

5

14%

LEVEL 2

7

19%

LEVEL 3

18

49%

LEVEL 4

7

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

6

15%

LEVEL 2

15

37%

LEVEL 3

15

37%

LEVEL 4

5

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

206
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

16

5%

LEVEL 2

80

26%

LEVEL 3

99

33%

LEVEL 4

107

35%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

210
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

20

7%

LEVEL 2

77

25%

LEVEL 3

93

30%

LEVEL 4

117

38%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

25
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

25

35%

LEVEL 2

22

31%

LEVEL 3

17

24%

LEVEL 4

8

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

23

34%

LEVEL 2

29

43%

LEVEL 3

10

15%

LEVEL 4

6

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

224
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

39

11%

LEVEL 2

99

27%

LEVEL 3

110

30%

LEVEL 4

114

31%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

222
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

38

10%

LEVEL 2

102

28%

LEVEL 3

100

28%

LEVEL 4

122

34%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

7
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

6

50%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

5

38%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

116
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

8

5%

LEVEL 2

38

23%

LEVEL 3

49

30%

LEVEL 4

67

41%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

122
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

10

6%

LEVEL 2

42

24%

LEVEL 3

53

30%

LEVEL 4

69

40%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

115
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

33

16%

LEVEL 2

64

30%

LEVEL 3

67

32%

LEVEL 4

48

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

104
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

33

16%

LEVEL 2

64

32%

LEVEL 3

50

25%

LEVEL 4

54

27%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

230
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 368

LEVEL 1

39

11%

LEVEL 2

99

27%

LEVEL 3

115

31%

LEVEL 4

115

31%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

213
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

38

11%

LEVEL 2

105

29%

LEVEL 3

96

27%

LEVEL 4

117

33%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

13
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

5

26%

LEVEL 2

1

5%

LEVEL 3

7

37%

LEVEL 4

6

32%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.