Skip to Content
Main content

PS 195 MANHATTAN BEACH GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

186
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

31

14%

LEVEL 3

69

31%

LEVEL 4

117

53%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

186
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

9

4%

LEVEL 2

37

16%

LEVEL 3

73

31%

LEVEL 4

113

49%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

86
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

5

5%

LEVEL 2

12

12%

LEVEL 3

31

30%

LEVEL 4

55

53%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

84
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

3

3%

LEVEL 2

20

19%

LEVEL 3

36

34%

LEVEL 4

48

45%

MALE

PROFICIENT

100
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

19

16%

LEVEL 3

38

32%

LEVEL 4

62

52%

MALE

PROFICIENT

102
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

6

5%

LEVEL 2

17

14%

LEVEL 3

37

30%

LEVEL 4

65

52%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

12
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

5

38%

LEVEL 4

7

54%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

7

78%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

168
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

29

14%

LEVEL 3

62

31%

LEVEL 4

106

53%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

173
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

9

4%

LEVEL 2

32

15%

LEVEL 3

70

33%

LEVEL 4

103

48%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

183
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

29

13%

LEVEL 3

67

31%

LEVEL 4

116

54%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

177
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

33

15%

LEVEL 3

67

31%

LEVEL 4

110

51%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

4

24%

LEVEL 2

4

24%

LEVEL 3

6

35%

LEVEL 4

3

18%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

177
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

25

12%

LEVEL 3

60

29%

LEVEL 4

117

57%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

173
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

30

14%

LEVEL 3

62

30%

LEVEL 4

111

53%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

9
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

2

12%

LEVEL 2

6

35%

LEVEL 3

9

53%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

13
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

4

17%

LEVEL 2

7

29%

LEVEL 3

11

46%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

128
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

17

11%

LEVEL 3

43

29%

LEVEL 4

85

57%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

134
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

19

12%

LEVEL 3

50

32%

LEVEL 4

84

53%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

14

19%

LEVEL 3

26

35%

LEVEL 4

32

43%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

4

5%

LEVEL 2

18

24%

LEVEL 3

23

31%

LEVEL 4

29

39%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.