JHS 14 SHELL BANK GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

132
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 482

LEVEL 1

222

46%

LEVEL 2

128

27%

LEVEL 3

80

17%

LEVEL 4

52

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

162
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 498

LEVEL 1

202

41%

LEVEL 2

134

27%

LEVEL 3

91

18%

LEVEL 4

71

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

58
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

91

43%

LEVEL 2

65

30%

LEVEL 3

33

15%

LEVEL 4

25

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

72
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

79

36%

LEVEL 2

71

32%

LEVEL 3

45

20%

LEVEL 4

27

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

74
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

131

49%

LEVEL 2

63

24%

LEVEL 3

47

18%

LEVEL 4

27

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

90
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

123

45%

LEVEL 2

63

23%

LEVEL 3

46

17%

LEVEL 4

44

16%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

35
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

26

35%

LEVEL 2

14

19%

LEVEL 3

19

25%

LEVEL 4

16

21%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

38
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

25

30%

LEVEL 2

19

23%

LEVEL 3

15

18%

LEVEL 4

23

28%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

45
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

64

45%

LEVEL 2

34

24%

LEVEL 3

24

17%

LEVEL 4

21

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

58
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

57

36%

LEVEL 2

42

27%

LEVEL 3

31

20%

LEVEL 4

27

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

34
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

96

52%

LEVEL 2

53

29%

LEVEL 3

23

13%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

47
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

78

45%

LEVEL 2

49

28%

LEVEL 3

33

19%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

32

43%

LEVEL 2

27

36%

LEVEL 3

13

17%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

37

48%

LEVEL 2

24

31%

LEVEL 3

9

12%

LEVEL 4

7

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

124
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 389

LEVEL 1

153

39%

LEVEL 2

112

29%

LEVEL 3

76

20%

LEVEL 4

48

12%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

154
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 399

LEVEL 1

136

34%

LEVEL 2

109

27%

LEVEL 3

86

22%

LEVEL 4

68

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

69

74%

LEVEL 2

16

17%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

66

67%

LEVEL 2

25

25%

LEVEL 3

5

5%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

117
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

138

39%

LEVEL 2

95

27%

LEVEL 3

69

20%

LEVEL 4

48

14%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

144
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

117

33%

LEVEL 2

93

26%

LEVEL 3

80

23%

LEVEL 4

64

18%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

15
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

84

64%

LEVEL 2

33

25%

LEVEL 3

11

8%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

18
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

85

59%

LEVEL 2

41

28%

LEVEL 3

11

8%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

17

43%

LEVEL 2

9

23%

LEVEL 3

7

18%

LEVEL 4

7

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

18

31%

LEVEL 2

12

21%

LEVEL 3

17

29%

LEVEL 4

11

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

118
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 442

LEVEL 1

205

46%

LEVEL 2

119

27%

LEVEL 3

73

17%

LEVEL 4

45

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

134
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 440

LEVEL 1

184

42%

LEVEL 2

122

28%

LEVEL 3

74

17%

LEVEL 4

60

14%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

122
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 416

LEVEL 1

186

45%

LEVEL 2

108

26%

LEVEL 3

74

18%

LEVEL 4

48

12%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

150
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 434

LEVEL 1

167

38%

LEVEL 2

117

27%

LEVEL 3

83

19%

LEVEL 4

67

15%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

10
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

36

55%

LEVEL 2

20

30%

LEVEL 3

6

9%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

12
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

35

55%

LEVEL 2

17

27%

LEVEL 3

8

13%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.