Skip to Content
Main content

JHS 78 ROY H MANN GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

96
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 477

LEVEL 1

231

48%

LEVEL 2

150

31%

LEVEL 3

76

16%

LEVEL 4

20

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

171
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 552

LEVEL 1

205

37%

LEVEL 2

176

32%

LEVEL 3

114

21%

LEVEL 4

57

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

50
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

103

46%

LEVEL 2

73

32%

LEVEL 3

38

17%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

91
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

84

33%

LEVEL 2

76

30%

LEVEL 3

61

24%

LEVEL 4

30

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

46
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

128

51%

LEVEL 2

77

31%

LEVEL 3

38

15%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

80
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

121

40%

LEVEL 2

100

33%

LEVEL 3

53

18%

LEVEL 4

27

9%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

5
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

3

50%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

12
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

11

31%

LEVEL 2

12

34%

LEVEL 3

9

26%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

16
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

9

26%

LEVEL 2

9

26%

LEVEL 3

9

26%

LEVEL 4

7

21%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

19
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

21

40%

LEVEL 2

13

25%

LEVEL 3

13

25%

LEVEL 4

6

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

32
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

24

31%

LEVEL 2

21

27%

LEVEL 3

17

22%

LEVEL 4

15

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

50
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

177

52%

LEVEL 2

111

33%

LEVEL 3

43

13%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

93
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

147

40%

LEVEL 2

129

35%

LEVEL 3

69

19%

LEVEL 4

24

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

20

48%

LEVEL 2

11

26%

LEVEL 3

9

21%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

22

37%

LEVEL 2

17

29%

LEVEL 3

14

24%

LEVEL 4

6

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

91
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 398

LEVEL 1

170

43%

LEVEL 2

137

34%

LEVEL 3

73

18%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

158
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 425

LEVEL 1

124

29%

LEVEL 2

143

34%

LEVEL 3

103

24%

LEVEL 4

55

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

61

77%

LEVEL 2

13

16%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

81

64%

LEVEL 2

33

26%

LEVEL 3

11

9%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

95
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 448

LEVEL 1

208

46%

LEVEL 2

145

32%

LEVEL 3

75

17%

LEVEL 4

20

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

170
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 517

LEVEL 1

176

34%

LEVEL 2

171

33%

LEVEL 3

113

22%

LEVEL 4

57

11%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

23

79%

LEVEL 2

5

17%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

29

83%

LEVEL 2

5

14%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

30

39%

LEVEL 2

29

38%

LEVEL 3

12

16%

LEVEL 4

6

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

42

30%

LEVEL 2

41

30%

LEVEL 3

33

24%

LEVEL 4

22

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

78
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 400

LEVEL 1

201

50%

LEVEL 2

121

30%

LEVEL 3

64

16%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

116
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 414

LEVEL 1

163

39%

LEVEL 2

135

33%

LEVEL 3

81

20%

LEVEL 4

35

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

85
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 426

LEVEL 1

199

47%

LEVEL 2

142

33%

LEVEL 3

66

15%

LEVEL 4

19

4%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

158
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 498

LEVEL 1

182

37%

LEVEL 2

158

32%

LEVEL 3

103

21%

LEVEL 4

55

11%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

11
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

32

63%

LEVEL 2

8

16%

LEVEL 3

10

20%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

13
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

23

43%

LEVEL 2

18

33%

LEVEL 3

11

20%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.