PS 109 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

118
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 439

LEVEL 1

204

46%

LEVEL 2

117

27%

LEVEL 3

72

16%

LEVEL 4

46

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

91
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

161

47%

LEVEL 2

94

27%

LEVEL 3

62

18%

LEVEL 4

29

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

66
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

103

47%

LEVEL 2

48

22%

LEVEL 3

41

19%

LEVEL 4

25

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

50
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

76

44%

LEVEL 2

45

26%

LEVEL 3

33

19%

LEVEL 4

17

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

52
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

101

45%

LEVEL 2

69

31%

LEVEL 3

31

14%

LEVEL 4

21

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

41
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

85

49%

LEVEL 2

49

28%

LEVEL 3

29

17%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

3

30%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

3

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

3
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

4

40%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

92
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

165

46%

LEVEL 2

98

28%

LEVEL 3

55

15%

LEVEL 4

37

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

73
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

130

48%

LEVEL 2

66

25%

LEVEL 3

53

20%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

29

50%

LEVEL 2

13

22%

LEVEL 3

11

19%

LEVEL 4

5

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

25

44%

LEVEL 2

20

35%

LEVEL 3

8

14%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

109
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

142

41%

LEVEL 2

96

28%

LEVEL 3

64

18%

LEVEL 4

45

13%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

79
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

112

43%

LEVEL 2

67

26%

LEVEL 3

51

20%

LEVEL 4

28

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

62

67%

LEVEL 2

21

23%

LEVEL 3

8

9%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

49

56%

LEVEL 2

27

31%

LEVEL 3

11

13%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

113
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 407

LEVEL 1

184

45%

LEVEL 2

110

27%

LEVEL 3

68

17%

LEVEL 4

45

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

88
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

142

44%

LEVEL 2

90

28%

LEVEL 3

59

18%

LEVEL 4

29

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

5
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

20

63%

LEVEL 2

7

22%

LEVEL 3

4

13%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

19

73%

LEVEL 2

4

15%

LEVEL 3

3

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

22

38%

LEVEL 2

12

21%

LEVEL 3

16

28%

LEVEL 4

8

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

12

28%

LEVEL 2

13

30%

LEVEL 3

11

26%

LEVEL 4

7

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

94
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 381

LEVEL 1

182

48%

LEVEL 2

105

28%

LEVEL 3

56

15%

LEVEL 4

38

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

73
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

149

49%

LEVEL 2

81

27%

LEVEL 3

51

17%

LEVEL 4

22

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

90
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

143

45%

LEVEL 2

86

27%

LEVEL 3

51

16%

LEVEL 4

39

12%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

80
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

124

45%

LEVEL 2

71

26%

LEVEL 3

53

19%

LEVEL 4

27

10%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

28
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

61

51%

LEVEL 2

31

26%

LEVEL 3

21

18%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

11
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

37

52%

LEVEL 2

23

32%

LEVEL 3

9

13%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.