PS 288 SHIRLEY TANYHILL (THE) GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

75
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

206

55%

LEVEL 2

92

25%

LEVEL 3

55

15%

LEVEL 4

20

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

80
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

193

54%

LEVEL 2

83

23%

LEVEL 3

56

16%

LEVEL 4

24

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

34
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

95

55%

LEVEL 2

43

25%

LEVEL 3

25

15%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

46
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

95

55%

LEVEL 2

31

18%

LEVEL 3

35

20%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

41
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

111

55%

LEVEL 2

49

24%

LEVEL 3

30

15%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

34
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

98

53%

LEVEL 2

52

28%

LEVEL 3

21

11%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

6
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

17

61%

LEVEL 2

5

18%

LEVEL 3

3

11%

LEVEL 4

3

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

4
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

11

50%

LEVEL 2

7

32%

LEVEL 3

2

9%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

42
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

119

57%

LEVEL 2

46

22%

LEVEL 3

33

16%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

36
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

115

61%

LEVEL 2

39

21%

LEVEL 3

27

14%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

22
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

67

52%

LEVEL 2

40

31%

LEVEL 3

17

13%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

33
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

66

49%

LEVEL 2

36

27%

LEVEL 3

23

17%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

71
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

114

45%

LEVEL 2

69

27%

LEVEL 3

51

20%

LEVEL 4

20

8%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

71
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

112

46%

LEVEL 2

62

25%

LEVEL 3

48

20%

LEVEL 4

23

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

92

77%

LEVEL 2

23

19%

LEVEL 3

4

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

81

73%

LEVEL 2

21

19%

LEVEL 3

8

7%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

72
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

188

55%

LEVEL 2

82

24%

LEVEL 3

53

15%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

75
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

176

54%

LEVEL 2

76

23%

LEVEL 3

52

16%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

18

58%

LEVEL 2

10

32%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

5
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

17

59%

LEVEL 2

7

24%

LEVEL 3

4

14%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

14

52%

LEVEL 2

6

22%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

6

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

13

57%

LEVEL 2

5

22%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

4

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

68
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

192

55%

LEVEL 2

86

25%

LEVEL 3

54

16%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

75
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

180

54%

LEVEL 2

78

23%

LEVEL 3

55

17%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

64
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

169

55%

LEVEL 2

73

24%

LEVEL 3

47

15%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

76
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

179

53%

LEVEL 2

82

24%

LEVEL 3

54

16%

LEVEL 4

22

7%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

11
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

37

55%

LEVEL 2

19

28%

LEVEL 3

8

12%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

14

74%

LEVEL 2

1

5%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.