Skip to Content
Main content

PS 212 LADY DEBORAH MOODY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

164
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

83

25%

LEVEL 2

80

24%

LEVEL 3

99

30%

LEVEL 4

65

20%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

163
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

85

26%

LEVEL 2

80

24%

LEVEL 3

75

23%

LEVEL 4

88

27%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

83
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

46

27%

LEVEL 2

41

24%

LEVEL 3

45

26%

LEVEL 4

38

22%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

76
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

45

27%

LEVEL 2

47

28%

LEVEL 3

37

22%

LEVEL 4

39

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

81
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

37

24%

LEVEL 2

39

25%

LEVEL 3

54

34%

LEVEL 4

27

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

87
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

40

25%

LEVEL 2

33

21%

LEVEL 3

38

24%

LEVEL 4

49

31%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

82
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

6

6%

LEVEL 2

19

18%

LEVEL 3

38

36%

LEVEL 4

44

41%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

77
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

9

9%

LEVEL 2

18

17%

LEVEL 3

24

23%

LEVEL 4

53

51%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

25
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

9

18%

LEVEL 2

16

32%

LEVEL 3

15

30%

LEVEL 4

10

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

31
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

12

21%

LEVEL 2

13

23%

LEVEL 3

16

29%

LEVEL 4

15

27%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

41
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

51

41%

LEVEL 2

33

26%

LEVEL 3

33

26%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

40
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

44

36%

LEVEL 2

38

31%

LEVEL 3

23

19%

LEVEL 4

17

14%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

153
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

33

13%

LEVEL 2

59

24%

LEVEL 3

90

37%

LEVEL 4

63

26%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

151
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

39

16%

LEVEL 2

60

24%

LEVEL 3

65

26%

LEVEL 4

86

34%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

50

61%

LEVEL 2

21

26%

LEVEL 3

9

11%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

46

59%

LEVEL 2

20

26%

LEVEL 3

10

13%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

145
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

65

23%

LEVEL 2

67

24%

LEVEL 3

85

31%

LEVEL 4

60

22%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

139
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

65

25%

LEVEL 2

61

23%

LEVEL 3

60

23%

LEVEL 4

79

30%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

19
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

18

36%

LEVEL 2

13

26%

LEVEL 3

14

28%

LEVEL 4

5

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

24
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

20

32%

LEVEL 2

19

30%

LEVEL 3

15

24%

LEVEL 4

9

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

7

16%

LEVEL 2

8

19%

LEVEL 3

15

35%

LEVEL 4

13

30%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

10

22%

LEVEL 2

7

15%

LEVEL 3

12

26%

LEVEL 4

17

37%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

136
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

76

27%

LEVEL 2

72

25%

LEVEL 3

84

30%

LEVEL 4

52

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

134
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

75

27%

LEVEL 2

73

26%

LEVEL 3

63

22%

LEVEL 4

71

25%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

153
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

69

23%

LEVEL 2

73

25%

LEVEL 3

91

31%

LEVEL 4

62

21%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

158
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

69

23%

LEVEL 2

74

25%

LEVEL 3

71

24%

LEVEL 4

87

29%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

11
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

14

44%

LEVEL 2

7

22%

LEVEL 3

8

25%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

16

59%

LEVEL 2

6

22%

LEVEL 3

4

15%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.