PS 238 ANNE SULLIVAN GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

85
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

154

46%

LEVEL 2

93

28%

LEVEL 3

52

16%

LEVEL 4

33

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

100
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

139

40%

LEVEL 2

107

31%

LEVEL 3

71

21%

LEVEL 4

29

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

40
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

67

43%

LEVEL 2

49

31%

LEVEL 3

25

16%

LEVEL 4

15

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

44
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

63

40%

LEVEL 2

50

32%

LEVEL 3

31

20%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

45
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

87

49%

LEVEL 2

44

25%

LEVEL 3

27

15%

LEVEL 4

18

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

56
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

76

40%

LEVEL 2

57

30%

LEVEL 3

40

21%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

22
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

28

39%

LEVEL 2

21

30%

LEVEL 3

9

13%

LEVEL 4

13

18%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

31
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

20

28%

LEVEL 2

21

29%

LEVEL 3

19

26%

LEVEL 4

12

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

19
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

30

44%

LEVEL 2

19

28%

LEVEL 3

14

21%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

22
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

24

31%

LEVEL 2

32

41%

LEVEL 3

15

19%

LEVEL 4

7

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

41
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

84

49%

LEVEL 2

48

28%

LEVEL 3

26

15%

LEVEL 4

15

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

43
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

85

48%

LEVEL 2

48

27%

LEVEL 3

33

19%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

76
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

105

41%

LEVEL 2

76

30%

LEVEL 3

45

18%

LEVEL 4

31

12%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

92
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

90

34%

LEVEL 2

80

31%

LEVEL 3

66

25%

LEVEL 4

26

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

49

65%

LEVEL 2

17

23%

LEVEL 3

7

9%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

49

58%

LEVEL 2

27

32%

LEVEL 3

5

6%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

71
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

86

38%

LEVEL 2

71

31%

LEVEL 3

41

18%

LEVEL 4

30

13%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

84
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

82

34%

LEVEL 2

75

31%

LEVEL 3

59

24%

LEVEL 4

25

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

14
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

68

65%

LEVEL 2

22

21%

LEVEL 3

11

11%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

16
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

57

54%

LEVEL 2

32

30%

LEVEL 3

12

11%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

14

31%

LEVEL 2

12

27%

LEVEL 3

13

29%

LEVEL 4

6

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

15

31%

LEVEL 2

14

29%

LEVEL 3

12

25%

LEVEL 4

7

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

66
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

140

49%

LEVEL 2

81

28%

LEVEL 3

39

14%

LEVEL 4

27

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

81
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

124

42%

LEVEL 2

93

31%

LEVEL 3

59

20%

LEVEL 4

22

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

74
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

118

43%

LEVEL 2

80

29%

LEVEL 3

47

17%

LEVEL 4

27

10%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

85
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

112

38%

LEVEL 2

95

33%

LEVEL 3

60

21%

LEVEL 4

25

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

11
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

36

60%

LEVEL 2

13

22%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

6

10%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

15
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

27

50%

LEVEL 2

12

22%

LEVEL 3

11

20%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.