Skip to Content
Main content

PS 99 ISAAC ASIMOV GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

230
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 520

LEVEL 1

146

28%

LEVEL 2

144

28%

LEVEL 3

108

21%

LEVEL 4

122

23%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

255
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 518

LEVEL 1

121

23%

LEVEL 2

142

27%

LEVEL 3

104

20%

LEVEL 4

151

29%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

116
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

62

24%

LEVEL 2

80

31%

LEVEL 3

58

22%

LEVEL 4

58

22%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

116
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

54

23%

LEVEL 2

70

29%

LEVEL 3

54

23%

LEVEL 4

62

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

114
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

84

32%

LEVEL 2

64

24%

LEVEL 3

50

19%

LEVEL 4

64

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

139
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

67

24%

LEVEL 2

72

26%

LEVEL 3

50

18%

LEVEL 4

89

32%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

100
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

52

24%

LEVEL 2

62

29%

LEVEL 3

41

19%

LEVEL 4

59

28%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

113
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

40

19%

LEVEL 2

62

29%

LEVEL 3

39

18%

LEVEL 4

74

34%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

90
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

27

17%

LEVEL 2

39

25%

LEVEL 3

36

23%

LEVEL 4

54

35%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

98
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

30

18%

LEVEL 2

41

24%

LEVEL 3

37

22%

LEVEL 4

61

36%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

29

58%

LEVEL 2

14

28%

LEVEL 3

7

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

30
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

37

39%

LEVEL 2

28

29%

LEVEL 3

22

23%

LEVEL 4

8

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

35
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

25

29%

LEVEL 2

27

31%

LEVEL 3

22

25%

LEVEL 4

13

15%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

224
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 437

LEVEL 1

87

20%

LEVEL 2

126

29%

LEVEL 3

104

24%

LEVEL 4

120

27%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

247
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 433

LEVEL 1

66

15%

LEVEL 2

120

28%

LEVEL 3

101

23%

LEVEL 4

146

34%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

59

71%

LEVEL 2

18

22%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

55

65%

LEVEL 2

22

26%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

202
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

69

19%

LEVEL 2

86

24%

LEVEL 3

86

24%

LEVEL 4

116

32%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

226
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

62

17%

LEVEL 2

81

22%

LEVEL 3

83

22%

LEVEL 4

143

39%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

28
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

77

47%

LEVEL 2

58

36%

LEVEL 3

22

13%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

29
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

59

40%

LEVEL 2

61

41%

LEVEL 3

21

14%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

74
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

23

19%

LEVEL 2

23

19%

LEVEL 3

26

22%

LEVEL 4

48

40%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

99
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

18

13%

LEVEL 2

25

18%

LEVEL 3

35

25%

LEVEL 4

64

45%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

156
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 400

LEVEL 1

123

31%

LEVEL 2

121

30%

LEVEL 3

82

21%

LEVEL 4

74

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

156
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

103

27%

LEVEL 2

117

31%

LEVEL 3

69

18%

LEVEL 4

87

23%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

225
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 504

LEVEL 1

141

28%

LEVEL 2

138

27%

LEVEL 3

104

21%

LEVEL 4

121

24%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

250
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 499

LEVEL 1

113

23%

LEVEL 2

136

27%

LEVEL 3

99

20%

LEVEL 4

151

30%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

5

31%

LEVEL 2

6

38%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

8

42%

LEVEL 2

6

32%

LEVEL 3

5

26%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.