PS 121 NELSON A ROCKEFELLER GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

112
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

30

16%

LEVEL 2

50

26%

LEVEL 3

65

34%

LEVEL 4

47

24%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

119
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

27

14%

LEVEL 2

48

25%

LEVEL 3

65

34%

LEVEL 4

54

28%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

58
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

15

15%

LEVEL 2

25

26%

LEVEL 3

39

40%

LEVEL 4

19

19%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

56
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

13

14%

LEVEL 2

22

24%

LEVEL 3

29

32%

LEVEL 4

27

30%

MALE

PROFICIENT

54
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

15

16%

LEVEL 2

25

27%

LEVEL 3

26

28%

LEVEL 4

28

30%

MALE

PROFICIENT

63
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

14

14%

LEVEL 2

26

25%

LEVEL 3

36

35%

LEVEL 4

27

26%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

31
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

3

7%

LEVEL 2

9

21%

LEVEL 3

14

33%

LEVEL 4

17

40%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

30
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

8

20%

LEVEL 3

11

28%

LEVEL 4

19

48%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

42
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

5

8%

LEVEL 2

14

23%

LEVEL 3

25

41%

LEVEL 4

17

28%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

43
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

8

13%

LEVEL 2

12

19%

LEVEL 3

23

37%

LEVEL 4

20

32%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

37
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

20

24%

LEVEL 2

26

31%

LEVEL 3

25

30%

LEVEL 4

12

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

44
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

14

16%

LEVEL 2

27

32%

LEVEL 3

30

35%

LEVEL 4

14

16%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

97
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

20

12%

LEVEL 2

46

28%

LEVEL 3

58

36%

LEVEL 4

39

24%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

107
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

15

9%

LEVEL 2

41

25%

LEVEL 3

58

36%

LEVEL 4

49

30%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

10

34%

LEVEL 2

4

14%

LEVEL 3

7

24%

LEVEL 4

8

28%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

12

39%

LEVEL 2

7

23%

LEVEL 3

7

23%

LEVEL 4

5

16%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

100
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

19

12%

LEVEL 2

38

24%

LEVEL 3

59

38%

LEVEL 4

41

26%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

106
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

19

13%

LEVEL 2

26

17%

LEVEL 3

54

36%

LEVEL 4

52

34%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

12
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

11

31%

LEVEL 2

12

34%

LEVEL 3

6

17%

LEVEL 4

6

17%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

13
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

8

19%

LEVEL 2

22

51%

LEVEL 3

11

26%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

9

13%

LEVEL 2

16

23%

LEVEL 3

26

38%

LEVEL 4

18

26%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

5

8%

LEVEL 2

12

19%

LEVEL 3

20

32%

LEVEL 4

25

40%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

68
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

21

17%

LEVEL 2

34

28%

LEVEL 3

39

32%

LEVEL 4

29

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

74
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

22

17%

LEVEL 2

36

27%

LEVEL 3

45

34%

LEVEL 4

29

22%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

110
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

25

14%

LEVEL 2

49

27%

LEVEL 3

64

35%

LEVEL 4

46

25%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

118
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

25

14%

LEVEL 2

42

23%

LEVEL 3

64

35%

LEVEL 4

54

29%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

5

63%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

6

67%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.