Skip to Content
Main content

PS 204 VINCE LOMBARDI GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

436
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 559

LEVEL 1

45

8%

LEVEL 2

78

14%

LEVEL 3

137

25%

LEVEL 4

299

53%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

414
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 556

LEVEL 1

60

11%

LEVEL 2

82

15%

LEVEL 3

126

23%

LEVEL 4

288

52%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

215
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

24

9%

LEVEL 2

32

12%

LEVEL 3

76

28%

LEVEL 4

139

51%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

198
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

25

9%

LEVEL 2

46

17%

LEVEL 3

68

25%

LEVEL 4

130

48%

MALE

PROFICIENT

221
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

21

7%

LEVEL 2

46

16%

LEVEL 3

61

21%

LEVEL 4

160

56%

MALE

PROFICIENT

216
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

35

12%

LEVEL 2

36

13%

LEVEL 3

58

20%

LEVEL 4

158

55%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

267
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

10

3%

LEVEL 2

27

9%

LEVEL 3

58

19%

LEVEL 4

209

69%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

263
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

11

4%

LEVEL 2

24

8%

LEVEL 3

58

19%

LEVEL 4

205

69%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

111
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

13

8%

LEVEL 2

32

21%

LEVEL 3

46

29%

LEVEL 4

65

42%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

97
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

19

13%

LEVEL 2

28

19%

LEVEL 3

42

29%

LEVEL 4

55

38%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

53
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

22

23%

LEVEL 2

19

20%

LEVEL 3

31

33%

LEVEL 4

22

23%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

49
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

30

28%

LEVEL 2

29

27%

LEVEL 3

24

22%

LEVEL 4

25

23%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

419
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 479

LEVEL 1

13

3%

LEVEL 2

47

10%

LEVEL 3

130

27%

LEVEL 4

289

60%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

389
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 465

LEVEL 1

16

3%

LEVEL 2

60

13%

LEVEL 3

112

24%

LEVEL 4

277

60%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

17
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

32

40%

LEVEL 2

31

39%

LEVEL 3

7

9%

LEVEL 4

10

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

25
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

44

48%

LEVEL 2

22

24%

LEVEL 3

14

15%

LEVEL 4

11

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

394
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 483

LEVEL 1

34

7%

LEVEL 2

55

11%

LEVEL 3

113

23%

LEVEL 4

281

58%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

375
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 481

LEVEL 1

40

8%

LEVEL 2

66

14%

LEVEL 3

100

21%

LEVEL 4

275

57%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

42
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

11

14%

LEVEL 2

23

30%

LEVEL 3

24

32%

LEVEL 4

18

24%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

39
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

20

27%

LEVEL 2

16

21%

LEVEL 3

26

35%

LEVEL 4

13

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

113
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

8

7%

LEVEL 3

28

23%

LEVEL 4

85

69%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

139
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

10

7%

LEVEL 3

34

22%

LEVEL 4

105

69%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

323
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 436

LEVEL 1

43

10%

LEVEL 2

70

16%

LEVEL 3

109

25%

LEVEL 4

214

49%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

275
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 403

LEVEL 1

56

14%

LEVEL 2

72

18%

LEVEL 3

92

23%

LEVEL 4

183

45%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

430
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 549

LEVEL 1

44

8%

LEVEL 2

75

14%

LEVEL 3

135

25%

LEVEL 4

295

54%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

410
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 550

LEVEL 1

60

11%

LEVEL 2

80

15%

LEVEL 3

124

23%

LEVEL 4

286

52%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

4

40%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.