PS 205 CLARION GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

386
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 584

LEVEL 1

84

14%

LEVEL 2

114

20%

LEVEL 3

126

22%

LEVEL 4

260

45%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

414
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 589

LEVEL 1

72

12%

LEVEL 2

103

17%

LEVEL 3

144

24%

LEVEL 4

270

46%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

194
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

35

12%

LEVEL 2

54

19%

LEVEL 3

61

22%

LEVEL 4

133

47%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

214
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

32

11%

LEVEL 2

56

19%

LEVEL 3

77

25%

LEVEL 4

137

45%

MALE

PROFICIENT

192
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

49

16%

LEVEL 2

60

20%

LEVEL 3

65

22%

LEVEL 4

127

42%

MALE

PROFICIENT

200
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

40

14%

LEVEL 2

47

16%

LEVEL 3

67

23%

LEVEL 4

133

46%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

296
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

23

6%

LEVEL 2

42

12%

LEVEL 3

86

24%

LEVEL 4

210

58%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

299
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

20

5%

LEVEL 2

46

13%

LEVEL 3

89

24%

LEVEL 4

210

58%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

58
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

19

17%

LEVEL 2

34

31%

LEVEL 3

23

21%

LEVEL 4

35

32%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

81
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

15

13%

LEVEL 2

20

17%

LEVEL 3

38

33%

LEVEL 4

43

37%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

31
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

35

34%

LEVEL 2

37

36%

LEVEL 3

16

16%

LEVEL 4

15

15%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

367
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 503

LEVEL 1

44

9%

LEVEL 2

92

18%

LEVEL 3

119

24%

LEVEL 4

248

49%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

389
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 502

LEVEL 1

39

8%

LEVEL 2

74

15%

LEVEL 3

126

25%

LEVEL 4

263

52%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

19
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

40

49%

LEVEL 2

22

27%

LEVEL 3

7

9%

LEVEL 4

12

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

25
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

33

38%

LEVEL 2

29

33%

LEVEL 3

18

21%

LEVEL 4

7

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

344
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 452

LEVEL 1

47

10%

LEVEL 2

61

13%

LEVEL 3

98

22%

LEVEL 4

246

54%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

374
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 462

LEVEL 1

31

7%

LEVEL 2

57

12%

LEVEL 3

120

26%

LEVEL 4

254

55%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

42
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

37

28%

LEVEL 2

53

40%

LEVEL 3

28

21%

LEVEL 4

14

11%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

40
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

41

32%

LEVEL 2

46

36%

LEVEL 3

24

19%

LEVEL 4

16

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

152
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

17

9%

LEVEL 2

28

14%

LEVEL 3

34

17%

LEVEL 4

118

60%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

148
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

20

10%

LEVEL 2

23

12%

LEVEL 3

40

21%

LEVEL 4

108

57%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

234
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 387

LEVEL 1

67

17%

LEVEL 2

86

22%

LEVEL 3

92

24%

LEVEL 4

142

37%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

266
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 398

LEVEL 1

52

13%

LEVEL 2

80

20%

LEVEL 3

104

26%

LEVEL 4

162

41%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

374
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 559

LEVEL 1

77

14%

LEVEL 2

108

19%

LEVEL 3

120

21%

LEVEL 4

254

45%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

399
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 563

LEVEL 1

68

12%

LEVEL 2

96

17%

LEVEL 3

137

24%

LEVEL 4

262

47%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

12
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

7

28%

LEVEL 2

6

24%

LEVEL 3

6

24%

LEVEL 4

6

24%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

15
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

4

15%

LEVEL 2

7

27%

LEVEL 3

7

27%

LEVEL 4

8

31%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.