PS 164 CAESAR RODNEY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

160
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

44

16%

LEVEL 2

72

26%

LEVEL 3

66

24%

LEVEL 4

94

34%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

184
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

48

17%

LEVEL 2

51

18%

LEVEL 3

69

24%

LEVEL 4

115

41%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

70
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

21

16%

LEVEL 2

39

30%

LEVEL 3

31

24%

LEVEL 4

39

30%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

80
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

26

19%

LEVEL 2

30

22%

LEVEL 3

28

21%

LEVEL 4

52

38%

MALE

PROFICIENT

90
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

23

16%

LEVEL 2

33

23%

LEVEL 3

35

24%

LEVEL 4

55

38%

MALE

PROFICIENT

104
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

22

15%

LEVEL 2

21

14%

LEVEL 3

41

28%

LEVEL 4

63

43%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

84
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

6

5%

LEVEL 2

21

19%

LEVEL 3

21

19%

LEVEL 4

63

57%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

102
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

6

5%

LEVEL 2

11

9%

LEVEL 3

27

23%

LEVEL 4

75

63%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

20
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

11

29%

LEVEL 2

7

18%

LEVEL 3

11

29%

LEVEL 4

9

24%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

22
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

11

29%

LEVEL 2

5

13%

LEVEL 3

5

13%

LEVEL 4

17

45%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

47
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

26

22%

LEVEL 2

43

37%

LEVEL 3

28

24%

LEVEL 4

19

16%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

52
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

31

27%

LEVEL 2

33

28%

LEVEL 3

33

28%

LEVEL 4

19

16%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

152
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

23

10%

LEVEL 2

58

25%

LEVEL 3

60

26%

LEVEL 4

92

39%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

175
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

21

9%

LEVEL 2

38

16%

LEVEL 3

61

26%

LEVEL 4

114

49%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

21

49%

LEVEL 2

14

33%

LEVEL 3

6

14%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

27

55%

LEVEL 2

13

27%

LEVEL 3

8

16%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

149
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

25

11%

LEVEL 2

56

24%

LEVEL 3

56

24%

LEVEL 4

93

40%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

180
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

30

12%

LEVEL 2

42

17%

LEVEL 3

65

26%

LEVEL 4

115

46%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

11
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

19

41%

LEVEL 2

16

35%

LEVEL 3

10

22%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

18

58%

LEVEL 2

9

29%

LEVEL 3

4

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

5

12%

LEVEL 2

11

26%

LEVEL 3

10

23%

LEVEL 4

17

40%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

3

6%

LEVEL 2

9

18%

LEVEL 3

9

18%

LEVEL 4

29

58%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

133
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

39

17%

LEVEL 2

61

26%

LEVEL 3

56

24%

LEVEL 4

77

33%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

146
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

45

19%

LEVEL 2

42

18%

LEVEL 3

60

26%

LEVEL 4

86

37%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

150
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

40

16%

LEVEL 2

62

25%

LEVEL 3

62

25%

LEVEL 4

88

35%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

167
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

39

16%

LEVEL 2

43

17%

LEVEL 3

63

25%

LEVEL 4

104

42%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

10
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

4

17%

LEVEL 2

10

42%

LEVEL 3

4

17%

LEVEL 4

6

25%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

17
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

9

26%

LEVEL 2

8

24%

LEVEL 3

6

18%

LEVEL 4

11

32%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.