Skip to Content
Main content

RALPH A FABRIZIO SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

329
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 498

LEVEL 1

69

14%

LEVEL 2

100

20%

LEVEL 3

129

26%

LEVEL 4

200

40%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

361
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 454

LEVEL 1

36

8%

LEVEL 2

57

13%

LEVEL 3

124

27%

LEVEL 4

237

52%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

149
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

34

14%

LEVEL 2

55

23%

LEVEL 3

60

25%

LEVEL 4

89

37%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

163
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

19

9%

LEVEL 2

23

11%

LEVEL 3

68

33%

LEVEL 4

95

46%

MALE

PROFICIENT

180
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

35

13%

LEVEL 2

45

17%

LEVEL 3

69

27%

LEVEL 4

111

43%

MALE

PROFICIENT

198
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

17

7%

LEVEL 2

34

14%

LEVEL 3

56

22%

LEVEL 4

142

57%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

212
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

18

7%

LEVEL 2

36

14%

LEVEL 3

65

24%

LEVEL 4

147

55%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

242
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

8

3%

LEVEL 2

19

7%

LEVEL 3

65

24%

LEVEL 4

177

66%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

75
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

23

18%

LEVEL 2

33

25%

LEVEL 3

40

31%

LEVEL 4

35

27%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

78
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

8

8%

LEVEL 2

18

17%

LEVEL 3

34

33%

LEVEL 4

44

42%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

36
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

26

28%

LEVEL 2

30

33%

LEVEL 3

21

23%

LEVEL 4

15

16%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

37
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

19

25%

LEVEL 2

20

26%

LEVEL 3

24

32%

LEVEL 4

13

17%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

309
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 425

LEVEL 1

38

9%

LEVEL 2

78

18%

LEVEL 3

114

27%

LEVEL 4

195

46%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

333
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 393

LEVEL 1

15

4%

LEVEL 2

45

11%

LEVEL 3

105

27%

LEVEL 4

228

58%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

20
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

31

42%

LEVEL 2

22

30%

LEVEL 3

15

21%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

28
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

21

34%

LEVEL 2

12

20%

LEVEL 3

19

31%

LEVEL 4

9

15%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

264
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

29

8%

LEVEL 2

60

17%

LEVEL 3

87

25%

LEVEL 4

177

50%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

290
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

16

5%

LEVEL 2

28

8%

LEVEL 3

75

22%

LEVEL 4

215

64%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

65
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

40

28%

LEVEL 2

40

28%

LEVEL 3

42

29%

LEVEL 4

23

16%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

71
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

20

17%

LEVEL 2

29

24%

LEVEL 3

49

41%

LEVEL 4

22

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

7

16%

LEVEL 3

12

27%

LEVEL 4

25

56%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

10%

LEVEL 3

11

26%

LEVEL 4

27

64%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

292
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 453

LEVEL 1

68

15%

LEVEL 2

93

21%

LEVEL 3

117

26%

LEVEL 4

175

39%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

323
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 412

LEVEL 1

36

9%

LEVEL 2

53

13%

LEVEL 3

113

27%

LEVEL 4

210

51%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

297
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 444

LEVEL 1

58

13%

LEVEL 2

89

20%

LEVEL 3

113

25%

LEVEL 4

184

41%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

318
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 395

LEVEL 1

29

7%

LEVEL 2

48

12%

LEVEL 3

108

27%

LEVEL 4

210

53%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

32
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

11

20%

LEVEL 2

11

20%

LEVEL 3

16

30%

LEVEL 4

16

30%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

43
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

7

12%

LEVEL 2

9

15%

LEVEL 3

16

27%

LEVEL 4

27

46%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.