Skip to Content
Main content

PS 48 MAPLETON GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

151
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

65

23%

LEVEL 2

64

23%

LEVEL 3

68

24%

LEVEL 4

83

30%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

151
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

53

21%

LEVEL 2

45

18%

LEVEL 3

66

27%

LEVEL 4

85

34%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

66
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

35

26%

LEVEL 2

33

25%

LEVEL 3

42

31%

LEVEL 4

24

18%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

65
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

31

25%

LEVEL 2

26

21%

LEVEL 3

37

30%

LEVEL 4

28

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

85
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

30

21%

LEVEL 2

31

21%

LEVEL 3

26

18%

LEVEL 4

59

40%

MALE

PROFICIENT

86
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

22

17%

LEVEL 2

19

15%

LEVEL 3

29

23%

LEVEL 4

57

45%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

88
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

15

12%

LEVEL 2

23

18%

LEVEL 3

30

24%

LEVEL 4

58

46%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

91
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

11

9%

LEVEL 2

15

13%

LEVEL 3

30

26%

LEVEL 4

61

52%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

33
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

21

31%

LEVEL 2

14

21%

LEVEL 3

18

26%

LEVEL 4

15

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

31
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

17

31%

LEVEL 2

7

13%

LEVEL 3

16

29%

LEVEL 4

15

27%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

23
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

29

38%

LEVEL 2

25

32%

LEVEL 3

15

19%

LEVEL 4

8

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

26
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

25

35%

LEVEL 2

21

29%

LEVEL 3

17

24%

LEVEL 4

9

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

134
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

36

17%

LEVEL 2

43

20%

LEVEL 3

55

26%

LEVEL 4

79

37%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

143
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

24

12%

LEVEL 2

29

15%

LEVEL 3

59

30%

LEVEL 4

84

43%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

17
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

29

43%

LEVEL 2

21

31%

LEVEL 3

13

19%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

29

55%

LEVEL 2

16

30%

LEVEL 3

7

13%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

126
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

32

16%

LEVEL 2

43

21%

LEVEL 3

53

26%

LEVEL 4

73

36%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

134
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

26

14%

LEVEL 2

30

16%

LEVEL 3

56

29%

LEVEL 4

78

41%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

25
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

33

42%

LEVEL 2

21

27%

LEVEL 3

15

19%

LEVEL 4

10

13%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

17
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

27

46%

LEVEL 2

15

25%

LEVEL 3

10

17%

LEVEL 4

7

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

13

16%

LEVEL 2

15

18%

LEVEL 3

20

24%

LEVEL 4

35

42%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

8

12%

LEVEL 2

10

15%

LEVEL 3

21

32%

LEVEL 4

26

40%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

96
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

52

26%

LEVEL 2

49

25%

LEVEL 3

48

24%

LEVEL 4

48

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

104
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

45

24%

LEVEL 2

35

19%

LEVEL 3

45

24%

LEVEL 4

59

32%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

149
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

58

21%

LEVEL 2

63

23%

LEVEL 3

68

25%

LEVEL 4

81

30%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

146
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

50

21%

LEVEL 2

45

19%

LEVEL 3

64

27%

LEVEL 4

82

34%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

7

70%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

3

38%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.