Skip to Content
Main content

CHRISTA MCAULIFFE SCHOOL/IS 187 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

660
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 690

LEVEL 1

24

3%

LEVEL 2

6

1%

LEVEL 3

20

3%

LEVEL 4

640

93%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

725
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 753

LEVEL 1

21

3%

LEVEL 2

7

1%

LEVEL 3

24

3%

LEVEL 4

701

93%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

348
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

8

2%

LEVEL 2

1

0%

LEVEL 3

10

3%

LEVEL 4

338

95%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

377
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 389

LEVEL 1

11

3%

LEVEL 2

1

0%

LEVEL 3

12

3%

LEVEL 4

365

94%

MALE

PROFICIENT

312
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

16

5%

LEVEL 2

5

2%

LEVEL 3

10

3%

LEVEL 4

302

91%

MALE

PROFICIENT

348
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 364

LEVEL 1

10

3%

LEVEL 2

6

2%

LEVEL 3

12

3%

LEVEL 4

336

92%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

460
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 471

LEVEL 1

6

1%

LEVEL 2

5

1%

LEVEL 3

6

1%

LEVEL 4

454

96%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

535
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 541

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

2

0%

LEVEL 3

14

3%

LEVEL 4

521

96%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

168
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

8

5%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

9

5%

LEVEL 4

159

90%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

155
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

9

5%

LEVEL 2

3

2%

LEVEL 3

6

4%

LEVEL 4

149

89%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

3

60%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

23
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

10

29%

LEVEL 2

1

3%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

20

59%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

641
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 641

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

13

2%

LEVEL 4

628

98%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

701
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 702

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

0%

LEVEL 3

12

2%

LEVEL 4

689

98%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

19
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

24

49%

LEVEL 2

6

12%

LEVEL 3

7

14%

LEVEL 4

12

24%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

24
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

21

41%

LEVEL 2

6

12%

LEVEL 3

12

24%

LEVEL 4

12

24%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

659
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 679

LEVEL 1

16

2%

LEVEL 2

4

1%

LEVEL 3

20

3%

LEVEL 4

639

94%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

723
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 743

LEVEL 1

14

2%

LEVEL 2

6

1%

LEVEL 3

23

3%

LEVEL 4

700

94%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

8

73%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

7

70%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

234
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

7

3%

LEVEL 4

227

95%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

295
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

3

1%

LEVEL 3

7

2%

LEVEL 4

288

96%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

426
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 452

LEVEL 1

20

4%

LEVEL 2

6

1%

LEVEL 3

13

3%

LEVEL 4

413

91%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

430
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 452

LEVEL 1

18

4%

LEVEL 2

4

1%

LEVEL 3

17

4%

LEVEL 4

413

91%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.