Skip to Content
Main content

PS 105 BLYTHEBOURNE (THE) GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

592
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 722

LEVEL 1

39

5%

LEVEL 2

91

13%

LEVEL 3

210

29%

LEVEL 4

382

53%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

557
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 678

LEVEL 1

38

6%

LEVEL 2

83

12%

LEVEL 3

137

20%

LEVEL 4

420

62%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

273
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

17

5%

LEVEL 2

52

15%

LEVEL 3

93

27%

LEVEL 4

180

53%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

244
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

16

5%

LEVEL 2

45

15%

LEVEL 3

58

19%

LEVEL 4

186

61%

MALE

PROFICIENT

319
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 380

LEVEL 1

22

6%

LEVEL 2

39

10%

LEVEL 3

117

31%

LEVEL 4

202

53%

MALE

PROFICIENT

313
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

22

6%

LEVEL 2

38

10%

LEVEL 3

79

21%

LEVEL 4

234

63%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

559
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 647

LEVEL 1

20

3%

LEVEL 2

68

11%

LEVEL 3

187

29%

LEVEL 4

372

57%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

530
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 613

LEVEL 1

21

3%

LEVEL 2

62

10%

LEVEL 3

125

20%

LEVEL 4

405

66%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

12

28%

LEVEL 2

13

30%

LEVEL 3

15

35%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

9

24%

LEVEL 2

11

29%

LEVEL 3

8

21%

LEVEL 4

10

26%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

573
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 675

LEVEL 1

24

4%

LEVEL 2

78

12%

LEVEL 3

196

29%

LEVEL 4

377

56%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

543
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 636

LEVEL 1

23

4%

LEVEL 2

70

11%

LEVEL 3

131

21%

LEVEL 4

412

65%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

19
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

15

32%

LEVEL 2

13

28%

LEVEL 3

14

30%

LEVEL 4

5

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

15

36%

LEVEL 2

13

31%

LEVEL 3

6

14%

LEVEL 4

8

19%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

449
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 510

LEVEL 1

11

2%

LEVEL 2

50

10%

LEVEL 3

143

28%

LEVEL 4

306

60%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

431
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 491

LEVEL 1

15

3%

LEVEL 2

45

9%

LEVEL 3

95

19%

LEVEL 4

336

68%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

143
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

28

13%

LEVEL 2

41

19%

LEVEL 3

67

32%

LEVEL 4

76

36%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

126
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

23

12%

LEVEL 2

38

20%

LEVEL 3

42

22%

LEVEL 4

84

45%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

3

4%

LEVEL 2

9

12%

LEVEL 3

18

25%

LEVEL 4

43

59%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

62
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

3

4%

LEVEL 2

6

8%

LEVEL 3

17

24%

LEVEL 4

45

63%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

531
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 649

LEVEL 1

36

6%

LEVEL 2

82

13%

LEVEL 3

192

30%

LEVEL 4

339

52%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

495
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 607

LEVEL 1

35

6%

LEVEL 2

77

13%

LEVEL 3

120

20%

LEVEL 4

375

62%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.