PS 163 BATH BEACH GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

236
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 428

LEVEL 1

81

19%

LEVEL 2

111

26%

LEVEL 3

122

29%

LEVEL 4

114

27%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

234
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 408

LEVEL 1

74

18%

LEVEL 2

100

25%

LEVEL 3

112

27%

LEVEL 4

122

30%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

120
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

44

21%

LEVEL 2

49

23%

LEVEL 3

63

30%

LEVEL 4

57

27%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

111
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

39

20%

LEVEL 2

46

23%

LEVEL 3

57

29%

LEVEL 4

54

28%

MALE

PROFICIENT

116
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

37

17%

LEVEL 2

62

29%

LEVEL 3

59

27%

LEVEL 4

57

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

123
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

35

17%

LEVEL 2

54

25%

LEVEL 3

55

26%

LEVEL 4

68

32%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

100
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

7

5%

LEVEL 2

21

16%

LEVEL 3

37

29%

LEVEL 4

63

49%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

91
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

13

11%

LEVEL 2

15

13%

LEVEL 3

37

31%

LEVEL 4

54

45%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

74
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

23

18%

LEVEL 2

34

26%

LEVEL 3

38

29%

LEVEL 4

36

27%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

75
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

18

15%

LEVEL 2

26

22%

LEVEL 3

34

29%

LEVEL 4

41

34%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

60
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

51

31%

LEVEL 2

51

31%

LEVEL 3

46

28%

LEVEL 4

14

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

63
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

42

26%

LEVEL 2

56

35%

LEVEL 3

39

24%

LEVEL 4

24

15%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

222
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

33

10%

LEVEL 2

80

24%

LEVEL 3

113

34%

LEVEL 4

109

33%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

219
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

41

13%

LEVEL 2

68

21%

LEVEL 3

100

30%

LEVEL 4

119

36%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

48

52%

LEVEL 2

31

33%

LEVEL 3

9

10%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

33

41%

LEVEL 2

32

40%

LEVEL 3

12

15%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

220
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

50

14%

LEVEL 2

90

25%

LEVEL 3

111

31%

LEVEL 4

109

30%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

218
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

40

12%

LEVEL 2

69

21%

LEVEL 3

102

31%

LEVEL 4

116

35%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

16
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

31

46%

LEVEL 2

21

31%

LEVEL 3

11

16%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

16
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

34

42%

LEVEL 2

31

38%

LEVEL 3

10

12%

LEVEL 4

6

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

11

14%

LEVEL 2

15

19%

LEVEL 3

25

31%

LEVEL 4

30

37%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

6

10%

LEVEL 2

8

13%

LEVEL 3

18

30%

LEVEL 4

29

48%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

181
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

70

20%

LEVEL 2

96

28%

LEVEL 3

97

28%

LEVEL 4

84

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

187
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

68

20%

LEVEL 2

92

27%

LEVEL 3

94

27%

LEVEL 4

93

27%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

222
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 397

LEVEL 1

72

18%

LEVEL 2

103

26%

LEVEL 3

113

28%

LEVEL 4

109

27%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

216
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 371

LEVEL 1

65

18%

LEVEL 2

90

24%

LEVEL 3

102

27%

LEVEL 4

114

31%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

14
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

9

29%

LEVEL 2

8

26%

LEVEL 3

9

29%

LEVEL 4

5

16%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

18
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

9

24%

LEVEL 2

10

27%

LEVEL 3

10

27%

LEVEL 4

8

22%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.