Skip to Content
Main content

PS 159 ISAAC PITKIN GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

145
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 387

LEVEL 1

154

40%

LEVEL 2

88

23%

LEVEL 3

79

20%

LEVEL 4

66

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

166
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

129

35%

LEVEL 2

78

21%

LEVEL 3

84

23%

LEVEL 4

82

22%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

71
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

82

41%

LEVEL 2

49

24%

LEVEL 3

41

20%

LEVEL 4

30

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

83
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

64

35%

LEVEL 2

37

20%

LEVEL 3

42

23%

LEVEL 4

41

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

74
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

72

39%

LEVEL 2

39

21%

LEVEL 3

38

21%

LEVEL 4

36

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

83
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

65

34%

LEVEL 2

41

22%

LEVEL 3

42

22%

LEVEL 4

41

22%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

81
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

25

18%

LEVEL 2

36

25%

LEVEL 3

35

25%

LEVEL 4

46

32%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

89
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

21

16%

LEVEL 2

23

17%

LEVEL 3

37

28%

LEVEL 4

52

39%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

34
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

71

52%

LEVEL 2

32

23%

LEVEL 3

22

16%

LEVEL 4

12

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

37
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

54

44%

LEVEL 2

33

27%

LEVEL 3

23

19%

LEVEL 4

14

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

24
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

53

55%

LEVEL 2

19

20%

LEVEL 3

17

18%

LEVEL 4

7

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

34
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

50

50%

LEVEL 2

17

17%

LEVEL 3

19

19%

LEVEL 4

15

15%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

134
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

104

33%

LEVEL 2

78

25%

LEVEL 3

70

22%

LEVEL 4

64

20%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

158
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

80

26%

LEVEL 2

70

23%

LEVEL 3

79

26%

LEVEL 4

79

26%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

50

70%

LEVEL 2

10

14%

LEVEL 3

9

13%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

49

75%

LEVEL 2

8

12%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

131
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

114

37%

LEVEL 2

67

21%

LEVEL 3

69

22%

LEVEL 4

62

20%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

143
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

93

31%

LEVEL 2

65

22%

LEVEL 3

69

23%

LEVEL 4

74

25%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

14
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

40

53%

LEVEL 2

21

28%

LEVEL 3

10

13%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

23
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

36

50%

LEVEL 2

13

18%

LEVEL 3

15

21%

LEVEL 4

8

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

20

39%

LEVEL 2

6

12%

LEVEL 3

9

18%

LEVEL 4

16

31%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

18

35%

LEVEL 2

10

20%

LEVEL 3

16

31%

LEVEL 4

7

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

120
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

134

40%

LEVEL 2

82

24%

LEVEL 3

70

21%

LEVEL 4

50

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

143
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

111

34%

LEVEL 2

68

21%

LEVEL 3

68

21%

LEVEL 4

75

23%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

136
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

127

37%

LEVEL 2

76

22%

LEVEL 3

77

23%

LEVEL 4

59

17%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

158
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

109

33%

LEVEL 2

64

19%

LEVEL 3

81

24%

LEVEL 4

77

23%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

9
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

27

56%

LEVEL 2

12

25%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

7

15%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

8
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

20

48%

LEVEL 2

14

33%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

5

12%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.