Skip to Content
Main content

PS 149 DANNY KAYE GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

89
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

128

42%

LEVEL 2

89

29%

LEVEL 3

49

16%

LEVEL 4

40

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

119
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

87

30%

LEVEL 2

88

30%

LEVEL 3

54

18%

LEVEL 4

65

22%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

50
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

64

41%

LEVEL 2

44

28%

LEVEL 3

26

16%

LEVEL 4

24

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

59
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

42

28%

LEVEL 2

48

32%

LEVEL 3

26

17%

LEVEL 4

33

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

39
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

64

43%

LEVEL 2

45

30%

LEVEL 3

23

16%

LEVEL 4

16

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

60
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

45

31%

LEVEL 2

40

28%

LEVEL 3

28

19%

LEVEL 4

32

22%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

4

40%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

48
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

77

43%

LEVEL 2

53

30%

LEVEL 3

26

15%

LEVEL 4

22

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

60
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

60

36%

LEVEL 2

48

29%

LEVEL 3

31

18%

LEVEL 4

29

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

32
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

44

41%

LEVEL 2

32

30%

LEVEL 3

19

18%

LEVEL 4

13

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

48
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

25

23%

LEVEL 2

34

32%

LEVEL 3

22

21%

LEVEL 4

26

24%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

81
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

91

37%

LEVEL 2

76

31%

LEVEL 3

41

17%

LEVEL 4

40

16%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

105
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

55

24%

LEVEL 2

69

30%

LEVEL 3

42

18%

LEVEL 4

63

28%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

37

64%

LEVEL 2

13

22%

LEVEL 3

8

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

32

49%

LEVEL 2

19

29%

LEVEL 3

12

18%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

87
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

110

39%

LEVEL 2

85

30%

LEVEL 3

47

17%

LEVEL 4

40

14%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

115
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

76

28%

LEVEL 2

78

29%

LEVEL 3

52

19%

LEVEL 4

63

23%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

18

75%

LEVEL 2

4

17%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

11

44%

LEVEL 2

10

40%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

4

21%

LEVEL 2

6

32%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

7

37%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

3

18%

LEVEL 2

5

29%

LEVEL 3

3

18%

LEVEL 4

6

35%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

80
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

124

43%

LEVEL 2

83

29%

LEVEL 3

47

16%

LEVEL 4

33

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

110
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

84

30%

LEVEL 2

83

30%

LEVEL 3

51

18%

LEVEL 4

59

21%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

70
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

104

42%

LEVEL 2

74

30%

LEVEL 3

40

16%

LEVEL 4

30

12%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

98
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

63

27%

LEVEL 2

71

31%

LEVEL 3

44

19%

LEVEL 4

54

23%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

19
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

24

41%

LEVEL 2

15

26%

LEVEL 3

9

16%

LEVEL 4

10

17%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

21
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

24

39%

LEVEL 2

17

27%

LEVEL 3

10

16%

LEVEL 4

11

18%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.