PS 244 RICHARD R GREEN GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

111
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

70

28%

LEVEL 2

68

27%

LEVEL 3

59

24%

LEVEL 4

52

21%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

96
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

51

26%

LEVEL 2

52

26%

LEVEL 3

57

29%

LEVEL 4

39

20%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

59
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

37

28%

LEVEL 2

36

27%

LEVEL 3

32

24%

LEVEL 4

27

20%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

45
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

28

29%

LEVEL 2

25

26%

LEVEL 3

25

26%

LEVEL 4

20

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

52
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

33

28%

LEVEL 2

32

27%

LEVEL 3

27

23%

LEVEL 4

25

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

51
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

23

23%

LEVEL 2

27

27%

LEVEL 3

32

32%

LEVEL 4

19

19%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

103
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

64

28%

LEVEL 2

58

26%

LEVEL 3

54

24%

LEVEL 4

49

22%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

89
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

49

27%

LEVEL 2

45

25%

LEVEL 3

55

30%

LEVEL 4

34

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

4

27%

LEVEL 2

6

40%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

99
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

43

22%

LEVEL 2

58

29%

LEVEL 3

51

26%

LEVEL 4

48

24%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

84
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

33

21%

LEVEL 2

43

27%

LEVEL 3

51

32%

LEVEL 4

33

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

27

55%

LEVEL 2

10

20%

LEVEL 3

8

16%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

18

46%

LEVEL 2

9

23%

LEVEL 3

6

15%

LEVEL 4

6

15%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

111
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

62

26%

LEVEL 2

63

27%

LEVEL 3

59

25%

LEVEL 4

52

22%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

95
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

49

25%

LEVEL 2

50

26%

LEVEL 3

56

29%

LEVEL 4

39

20%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

8

62%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

10

20%

LEVEL 2

11

22%

LEVEL 3

14

29%

LEVEL 4

14

29%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

6

22%

LEVEL 2

8

30%

LEVEL 3

10

37%

LEVEL 4

3

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

60

30%

LEVEL 2

57

29%

LEVEL 3

45

23%

LEVEL 4

38

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

45

26%

LEVEL 2

44

26%

LEVEL 3

47

27%

LEVEL 4

36

21%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

97
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

59

27%

LEVEL 2

60

28%

LEVEL 3

52

24%

LEVEL 4

45

21%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

86
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

40

23%

LEVEL 2

46

27%

LEVEL 3

51

30%

LEVEL 4

35

20%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

14
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

11

33%

LEVEL 2

8

24%

LEVEL 3

7

21%

LEVEL 4

7

21%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

10
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

11

41%

LEVEL 2

6

22%

LEVEL 3

6

22%

LEVEL 4

4

15%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.