Skip to Content
Main content

PS 268 EMMA LAZARUS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

48
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

66

42%

LEVEL 2

45

28%

LEVEL 3

31

19%

LEVEL 4

17

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

45
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

66

44%

LEVEL 2

38

26%

LEVEL 3

31

21%

LEVEL 4

14

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

31
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

34

37%

LEVEL 2

26

29%

LEVEL 3

20

22%

LEVEL 4

11

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

28
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

32

38%

LEVEL 2

24

29%

LEVEL 3

21

25%

LEVEL 4

7

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

17
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

32

47%

LEVEL 2

19

28%

LEVEL 3

11

16%

LEVEL 4

6

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

17
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

34

52%

LEVEL 2

14

22%

LEVEL 3

10

15%

LEVEL 4

7

11%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

41
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

61

42%

LEVEL 2

43

30%

LEVEL 3

29

20%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

37
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

61

47%

LEVEL 2

33

25%

LEVEL 3

25

19%

LEVEL 4

12

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

3

33%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

4

31%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

42
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

49

36%

LEVEL 2

44

33%

LEVEL 3

25

19%

LEVEL 4

17

13%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

41
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

49

40%

LEVEL 2

31

26%

LEVEL 3

28

23%

LEVEL 4

13

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

17

71%

LEVEL 2

1

4%

LEVEL 3

6

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

17

61%

LEVEL 2

7

25%

LEVEL 3

3

11%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

46
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

61

41%

LEVEL 2

41

28%

LEVEL 3

30

20%

LEVEL 4

16

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

42
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

60

43%

LEVEL 2

36

26%

LEVEL 3

28

20%

LEVEL 4

14

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

5

45%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

6

55%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

10

43%

LEVEL 2

6

26%

LEVEL 3

7

30%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

14

48%

LEVEL 2

7

24%

LEVEL 3

7

24%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

56

41%

LEVEL 2

39

29%

LEVEL 3

24

18%

LEVEL 4

17

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

52

43%

LEVEL 2

31

26%

LEVEL 3

24

20%

LEVEL 4

13

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

44
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

59

42%

LEVEL 2

39

27%

LEVEL 3

29

20%

LEVEL 4

15

11%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

42
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

59

43%

LEVEL 2

36

26%

LEVEL 3

30

22%

LEVEL 4

12

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

7

41%

LEVEL 2

6

35%

LEVEL 3

2

12%

LEVEL 4

2

12%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

7

58%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.