PS 114 RYDER ELEMENTARY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

67
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

71

34%

LEVEL 2

73

35%

LEVEL 3

48

23%

LEVEL 4

19

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

86
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

62

29%

LEVEL 2

66

31%

LEVEL 3

60

28%

LEVEL 4

26

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

32
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

37

37%

LEVEL 2

32

32%

LEVEL 3

24

24%

LEVEL 4

8

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

41
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

28

27%

LEVEL 2

36

34%

LEVEL 3

28

27%

LEVEL 4

13

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

35
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

34

31%

LEVEL 2

41

37%

LEVEL 3

24

22%

LEVEL 4

11

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

45
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

34

31%

LEVEL 2

30

28%

LEVEL 3

32

29%

LEVEL 4

13

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

60
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

63

34%

LEVEL 2

64

34%

LEVEL 3

42

22%

LEVEL 4

18

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

73
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

48

27%

LEVEL 2

58

32%

LEVEL 3

50

28%

LEVEL 4

23

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

7

47%

LEVEL 2

5

33%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

8

40%

LEVEL 2

4

20%

LEVEL 3

6

30%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

61
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

44

27%

LEVEL 2

61

37%

LEVEL 3

42

25%

LEVEL 4

19

11%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

80
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

41

24%

LEVEL 2

51

30%

LEVEL 3

56

33%

LEVEL 4

24

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

27

60%

LEVEL 2

12

27%

LEVEL 3

6

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

21

50%

LEVEL 2

15

36%

LEVEL 3

4

10%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

60
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

64

35%

LEVEL 2

61

33%

LEVEL 3

43

23%

LEVEL 4

17

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

82
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

45

25%

LEVEL 2

53

29%

LEVEL 3

56

31%

LEVEL 4

26

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

7
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

7

27%

LEVEL 2

12

46%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

17

50%

LEVEL 2

13

38%

LEVEL 3

4

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

11

25%

LEVEL 2

14

32%

LEVEL 3

14

32%

LEVEL 4

5

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

14

30%

LEVEL 2

11

23%

LEVEL 3

18

38%

LEVEL 4

4

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

60

36%

LEVEL 2

59

35%

LEVEL 3

34

20%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

64
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

48

29%

LEVEL 2

55

33%

LEVEL 3

42

25%

LEVEL 4

22

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

57
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

51

32%

LEVEL 2

51

32%

LEVEL 3

41

26%

LEVEL 4

16

10%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

64
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

48

30%

LEVEL 2

49

30%

LEVEL 3

43

27%

LEVEL 4

21

13%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

10
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

20

38%

LEVEL 2

22

42%

LEVEL 3

7

13%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

22
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

14

26%

LEVEL 2

17

32%

LEVEL 3

17

32%

LEVEL 4

5

9%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.