NORMA ADAMS CLEMONS ACADEMY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

77
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

182

54%

LEVEL 2

77

23%

LEVEL 3

50

15%

LEVEL 4

27

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

105
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

142

42%

LEVEL 2

88

26%

LEVEL 3

69

21%

LEVEL 4

36

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

39
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

96

55%

LEVEL 2

40

23%

LEVEL 3

27

15%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

53
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

78

45%

LEVEL 2

41

24%

LEVEL 3

36

21%

LEVEL 4

17

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

38
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

86

53%

LEVEL 2

37

23%

LEVEL 3

23

14%

LEVEL 4

15

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

52
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

64

39%

LEVEL 2

47

29%

LEVEL 3

33

20%

LEVEL 4

19

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

7
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

1

9%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

6

55%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

4
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

5

42%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

4

33%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

49
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

140

57%

LEVEL 2

56

23%

LEVEL 3

29

12%

LEVEL 4

20

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

74
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

108

43%

LEVEL 2

67

27%

LEVEL 3

52

21%

LEVEL 4

22

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

37

51%

LEVEL 2

17

24%

LEVEL 3

14

19%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

24
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

26

40%

LEVEL 2

15

23%

LEVEL 3

15

23%

LEVEL 4

9

14%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

70
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

149

52%

LEVEL 2

67

23%

LEVEL 3

43

15%

LEVEL 4

27

9%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

93
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

115

41%

LEVEL 2

75

27%

LEVEL 3

61

22%

LEVEL 4

32

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

33

66%

LEVEL 2

10

20%

LEVEL 3

7

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

27

52%

LEVEL 2

13

25%

LEVEL 3

8

15%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

66
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

140

53%

LEVEL 2

58

22%

LEVEL 3

41

16%

LEVEL 4

25

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

93
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

103

38%

LEVEL 2

75

28%

LEVEL 3

61

23%

LEVEL 4

32

12%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

11
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

42

58%

LEVEL 2

19

26%

LEVEL 3

9

13%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

12
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

39

61%

LEVEL 2

13

20%

LEVEL 3

8

13%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

21

46%

LEVEL 2

16

35%

LEVEL 3

5

11%

LEVEL 4

4

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

22

43%

LEVEL 2

13

25%

LEVEL 3

8

16%

LEVEL 4

8

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

68
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

161

56%

LEVEL 2

61

21%

LEVEL 3

45

16%

LEVEL 4

23

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

89
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

120

42%

LEVEL 2

75

26%

LEVEL 3

61

21%

LEVEL 4

28

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

63
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

137

53%

LEVEL 2

59

23%

LEVEL 3

40

15%

LEVEL 4

23

9%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

95
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

130

43%

LEVEL 2

80

26%

LEVEL 3

62

20%

LEVEL 4

33

11%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

14
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

45

58%

LEVEL 2

18

23%

LEVEL 3

10

13%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

10
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

12

40%

LEVEL 2

8

27%

LEVEL 3

7

23%

LEVEL 4

3

10%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.