PS 131 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

280
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 478

LEVEL 1

81

17%

LEVEL 2

117

24%

LEVEL 3

139

29%

LEVEL 4

141

29%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

273
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 453

LEVEL 1

66

15%

LEVEL 2

114

25%

LEVEL 3

126

28%

LEVEL 4

147

32%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

122
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

40

18%

LEVEL 2

66

29%

LEVEL 3

60

26%

LEVEL 4

62

27%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

125
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

40

18%

LEVEL 2

57

26%

LEVEL 3

62

28%

LEVEL 4

63

28%

MALE

PROFICIENT

158
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

41

16%

LEVEL 2

51

20%

LEVEL 3

79

32%

LEVEL 4

79

32%

MALE

PROFICIENT

148
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

26

11%

LEVEL 2

57

25%

LEVEL 3

64

28%

LEVEL 4

84

36%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

128
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

7

5%

LEVEL 2

16

11%

LEVEL 3

42

28%

LEVEL 4

86

57%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

130
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

20

13%

LEVEL 3

37

24%

LEVEL 4

93

61%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

24
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

4

10%

LEVEL 2

12

30%

LEVEL 3

14

35%

LEVEL 4

10

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

24
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

15

37%

LEVEL 3

13

32%

LEVEL 4

11

27%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

121
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

69

25%

LEVEL 2

87

31%

LEVEL 3

78

28%

LEVEL 4

43

16%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

116
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

60

24%

LEVEL 2

78

31%

LEVEL 3

73

29%

LEVEL 4

43

17%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

248
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 391

LEVEL 1

53

14%

LEVEL 2

90

23%

LEVEL 3

116

30%

LEVEL 4

132

34%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

249
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 374

LEVEL 1

40

11%

LEVEL 2

85

23%

LEVEL 3

108

29%

LEVEL 4

141

38%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

32
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

28

32%

LEVEL 2

27

31%

LEVEL 3

23

26%

LEVEL 4

9

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

24
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

26

33%

LEVEL 2

29

37%

LEVEL 3

18

23%

LEVEL 4

6

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

237
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

27

8%

LEVEL 2

71

21%

LEVEL 3

105

31%

LEVEL 4

132

39%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

242
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

29

8%

LEVEL 2

74

21%

LEVEL 3

104

30%

LEVEL 4

138

40%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

43
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

54

38%

LEVEL 2

46

32%

LEVEL 3

34

24%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

31
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

37

34%

LEVEL 2

40

37%

LEVEL 3

22

20%

LEVEL 4

9

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

5

8%

LEVEL 2

16

26%

LEVEL 3

15

24%

LEVEL 4

26

42%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

6

10%

LEVEL 2

14

24%

LEVEL 3

10

17%

LEVEL 4

28

48%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

239
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 416

LEVEL 1

76

18%

LEVEL 2

101

24%

LEVEL 3

124

30%

LEVEL 4

115

28%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

235
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 395

LEVEL 1

60

15%

LEVEL 2

100

25%

LEVEL 3

116

29%

LEVEL 4

119

30%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

273
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 463

LEVEL 1

75

16%

LEVEL 2

115

25%

LEVEL 3

136

29%

LEVEL 4

137

30%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

265
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 432

LEVEL 1

59

14%

LEVEL 2

108

25%

LEVEL 3

122

28%

LEVEL 4

143

33%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

7
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

6

40%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

4

27%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

8
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

7

33%

LEVEL 2

6

29%

LEVEL 3

4

19%

LEVEL 4

4

19%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.