Skip to Content
Main content

PS 29 JOHN M HARRIGAN GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

298
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 367

LEVEL 1

33

9%

LEVEL 2

36

10%

LEVEL 3

121

33%

LEVEL 4

177

48%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

305
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

15

4%

LEVEL 2

63

16%

LEVEL 3

117

31%

LEVEL 4

188

49%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

150
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

20

11%

LEVEL 2

17

9%

LEVEL 3

63

34%

LEVEL 4

87

47%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

151
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

9

5%

LEVEL 2

33

17%

LEVEL 3

59

31%

LEVEL 4

92

48%

MALE

PROFICIENT

148
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

13

7%

LEVEL 2

19

11%

LEVEL 3

58

32%

LEVEL 4

90

50%

MALE

PROFICIENT

154
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

30

16%

LEVEL 3

58

31%

LEVEL 4

96

51%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

28
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

2

6%

LEVEL 3

12

39%

LEVEL 4

16

52%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

22
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

4

18%

LEVEL 4

18

82%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

18
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

2

10%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

4

20%

LEVEL 4

14

70%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

14
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

26%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

12

63%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

223
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

18

7%

LEVEL 2

29

11%

LEVEL 3

92

34%

LEVEL 4

131

49%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

238
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

13

4%

LEVEL 2

42

14%

LEVEL 3

99

34%

LEVEL 4

139

47%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

5

50%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

3

43%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

25
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

7

19%

LEVEL 2

4

11%

LEVEL 3

11

31%

LEVEL 4

14

39%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

28
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

13

31%

LEVEL 3

12

29%

LEVEL 4

16

38%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

281
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

21

6%

LEVEL 2

28

8%

LEVEL 3

112

34%

LEVEL 4

169

51%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

286
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

8

2%

LEVEL 2

43

13%

LEVEL 3

106

31%

LEVEL 4

180

53%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

17
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

12

32%

LEVEL 2

8

22%

LEVEL 3

9

24%

LEVEL 4

8

22%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

19
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

7

15%

LEVEL 2

20

43%

LEVEL 3

11

24%

LEVEL 4

8

17%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

293
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

29

8%

LEVEL 2

34

10%

LEVEL 3

117

33%

LEVEL 4

176

49%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

303
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

12

3%

LEVEL 2

58

16%

LEVEL 3

116

31%

LEVEL 4

187

50%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

5
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

4

36%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

5

50%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

276
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

18

6%

LEVEL 2

30

9%

LEVEL 3

109

34%

LEVEL 4

167

52%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

277
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

13

4%

LEVEL 2

50

15%

LEVEL 3

105

31%

LEVEL 4

172

51%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

15

35%

LEVEL 2

6

14%

LEVEL 3

12

28%

LEVEL 4

10

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

13

30%

LEVEL 3

12

28%

LEVEL 4

16

37%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.