Skip to Content
Main content

PS 39 HENRY BRISTOW GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

156
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

10

6%

LEVEL 2

14

8%

LEVEL 3

46

26%

LEVEL 4

110

61%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

168
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

20

10%

LEVEL 3

41

21%

LEVEL 4

127

66%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

71
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

4

5%

LEVEL 2

7

9%

LEVEL 3

26

32%

LEVEL 4

45

55%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

75
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

12

13%

LEVEL 3

15

17%

LEVEL 4

60

67%

MALE

PROFICIENT

85
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

6

6%

LEVEL 2

7

7%

LEVEL 3

20

20%

LEVEL 4

65

66%

MALE

PROFICIENT

93
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

8

8%

LEVEL 3

26

25%

LEVEL 4

67

66%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

13
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

7%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

9

64%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

14
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

12

86%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

123
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

2

2%

LEVEL 3

31

24%

LEVEL 4

92

72%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

135
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

12

8%

LEVEL 3

30

20%

LEVEL 4

105

71%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

5

26%

LEVEL 2

4

21%

LEVEL 3

6

32%

LEVEL 4

4

21%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

7

50%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

3

21%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

3

20%

LEVEL 3

5

33%

LEVEL 4

6

40%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

141
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

6

4%

LEVEL 3

38

26%

LEVEL 4

103

69%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

152
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

13

8%

LEVEL 3

33

20%

LEVEL 4

119

71%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

8

26%

LEVEL 2

8

26%

LEVEL 3

8

26%

LEVEL 4

7

23%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

30%

LEVEL 3

8

35%

LEVEL 4

8

35%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

150
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

9

5%

LEVEL 2

14

8%

LEVEL 3

43

25%

LEVEL 4

107

62%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

163
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

19

10%

LEVEL 3

39

21%

LEVEL 4

124

67%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

3

43%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

3

43%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

137
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

9

6%

LEVEL 3

36

24%

LEVEL 4

101

68%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

146
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

15

9%

LEVEL 3

34

21%

LEVEL 4

112

69%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

7

23%

LEVEL 2

5

16%

LEVEL 3

10

32%

LEVEL 4

9

29%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

2

7%

LEVEL 2

5

17%

LEVEL 3

7

24%

LEVEL 4

15

52%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.