WINDSOR TERRACE SCHOOL (THE) GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

180
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

15

6%

LEVEL 2

39

17%

LEVEL 3

67

29%

LEVEL 4

113

48%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

164
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

22

9%

LEVEL 2

48

21%

LEVEL 3

80

34%

LEVEL 4

84

36%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

93
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

12

10%

LEVEL 2

19

15%

LEVEL 3

41

33%

LEVEL 4

52

42%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

73
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

15

13%

LEVEL 2

31

26%

LEVEL 3

40

34%

LEVEL 4

33

28%

MALE

PROFICIENT

87
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

3

3%

LEVEL 2

20

18%

LEVEL 3

26

24%

LEVEL 4

61

55%

MALE

PROFICIENT

91
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

7

6%

LEVEL 2

17

15%

LEVEL 3

40

35%

LEVEL 4

51

44%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

18
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

10%

LEVEL 3

7

35%

LEVEL 4

11

55%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

18
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

10%

LEVEL 3

9

45%

LEVEL 4

9

45%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

9
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

8

73%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

129
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

21

13%

LEVEL 3

48

31%

LEVEL 4

81

52%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

115
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

9

6%

LEVEL 2

29

19%

LEVEL 3

55

36%

LEVEL 4

60

39%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

22
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

6

15%

LEVEL 2

13

32%

LEVEL 3

10

24%

LEVEL 4

12

29%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

25
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

12

24%

LEVEL 2

14

27%

LEVEL 3

14

27%

LEVEL 4

11

22%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

165
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

25

13%

LEVEL 3

57

29%

LEVEL 4

108

55%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

148
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

10

5%

LEVEL 2

31

16%

LEVEL 3

69

37%

LEVEL 4

79

42%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

8

22%

LEVEL 2

14

38%

LEVEL 3

10

27%

LEVEL 4

5

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

12

27%

LEVEL 2

17

38%

LEVEL 3

11

24%

LEVEL 4

5

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

177
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

13

6%

LEVEL 2

32

14%

LEVEL 3

65

29%

LEVEL 4

112

50%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

164
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

16

7%

LEVEL 2

44

20%

LEVEL 3

80

36%

LEVEL 4

84

38%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

7

58%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

6

60%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

165
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

9

4%

LEVEL 2

29

14%

LEVEL 3

60

30%

LEVEL 4

105

52%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

143
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

15

8%

LEVEL 2

36

19%

LEVEL 3

65

34%

LEVEL 4

78

40%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

6

19%

LEVEL 2

10

32%

LEVEL 3

7

23%

LEVEL 4

8

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

7

18%

LEVEL 2

12

30%

LEVEL 3

15

38%

LEVEL 4

6

15%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.