PS/IS 157 BENJAMIN FRANKLIN GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

54
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

132

48%

LEVEL 2

88

32%

LEVEL 3

40

15%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

42
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

120

54%

LEVEL 2

61

27%

LEVEL 3

24

11%

LEVEL 4

18

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

31
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

57

43%

LEVEL 2

45

34%

LEVEL 3

25

19%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

25
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

51

46%

LEVEL 2

35

32%

LEVEL 3

14

13%

LEVEL 4

11

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

23
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

75

53%

LEVEL 2

43

30%

LEVEL 3

15

11%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

17
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

69

62%

LEVEL 2

26

23%

LEVEL 3

10

9%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

45
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

101

46%

LEVEL 2

72

33%

LEVEL 3

33

15%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

36
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

92

51%

LEVEL 2

51

28%

LEVEL 3

20

11%

LEVEL 4

16

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

52
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

93

41%

LEVEL 2

83

36%

LEVEL 3

38

17%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

41
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

84

46%

LEVEL 2

56

31%

LEVEL 3

24

13%

LEVEL 4

17

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

39

85%

LEVEL 2

5

11%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

36

86%

LEVEL 2

5

12%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

52
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

99

42%

LEVEL 2

82

35%

LEVEL 3

38

16%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

40
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

87

47%

LEVEL 2

57

31%

LEVEL 3

22

12%

LEVEL 4

18

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

33

80%

LEVEL 2

6

15%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

33

85%

LEVEL 2

4

10%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

17

49%

LEVEL 2

10

29%

LEVEL 3

6

17%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

18

49%

LEVEL 2

9

24%

LEVEL 3

6

16%

LEVEL 4

4

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

115

48%

LEVEL 2

78

33%

LEVEL 3

34

14%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

102

55%

LEVEL 2

52

28%

LEVEL 3

18

10%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

52
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

114

46%

LEVEL 2

84

34%

LEVEL 3

38

15%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

40
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

112

53%

LEVEL 2

60

28%

LEVEL 3

23

11%

LEVEL 4

17

8%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

18

75%

LEVEL 2

4

17%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

8

73%

LEVEL 2

1

9%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.