Skip to Content
Main content

PS 380 JOHN WAYNE ELEMENTARY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

134
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

46

18%

LEVEL 2

69

28%

LEVEL 3

78

31%

LEVEL 4

56

22%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

122
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

45

19%

LEVEL 2

65

28%

LEVEL 3

69

30%

LEVEL 4

53

23%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

75
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

20

15%

LEVEL 2

41

30%

LEVEL 3

50

37%

LEVEL 4

25

18%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

66
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

18

15%

LEVEL 2

38

31%

LEVEL 3

44

36%

LEVEL 4

22

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

59
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

26

23%

LEVEL 2

28

25%

LEVEL 3

28

25%

LEVEL 4

31

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

56
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

27

25%

LEVEL 2

27

25%

LEVEL 3

25

23%

LEVEL 4

31

28%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

20
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

12

26%

LEVEL 2

15

32%

LEVEL 3

14

30%

LEVEL 4

6

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

15
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

13

31%

LEVEL 2

14

33%

LEVEL 3

9

21%

LEVEL 4

6

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

106
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

34

18%

LEVEL 2

53

27%

LEVEL 3

61

32%

LEVEL 4

45

23%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

98
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

32

18%

LEVEL 2

51

28%

LEVEL 3

54

30%

LEVEL 4

44

24%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

121
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

27

13%

LEVEL 2

56

27%

LEVEL 3

67

33%

LEVEL 4

54

26%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

114
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

27

14%

LEVEL 2

51

27%

LEVEL 3

65

34%

LEVEL 4

49

26%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

19

42%

LEVEL 2

13

29%

LEVEL 3

11

24%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

18

45%

LEVEL 2

14

35%

LEVEL 3

4

10%

LEVEL 4

4

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

114
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

33

16%

LEVEL 2

62

30%

LEVEL 3

66

32%

LEVEL 4

48

23%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

113
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

32

16%

LEVEL 2

54

27%

LEVEL 3

64

32%

LEVEL 4

49

25%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

20
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

13

33%

LEVEL 2

7

18%

LEVEL 3

12

30%

LEVEL 4

8

20%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

9
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

13

39%

LEVEL 2

11

33%

LEVEL 3

5

15%

LEVEL 4

4

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

12

24%

LEVEL 2

12

24%

LEVEL 3

10

20%

LEVEL 4

17

33%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

6

13%

LEVEL 2

10

21%

LEVEL 3

15

31%

LEVEL 4

17

35%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

107
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

34

17%

LEVEL 2

57

29%

LEVEL 3

68

34%

LEVEL 4

39

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

90
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

39

21%

LEVEL 2

55

30%

LEVEL 3

54

29%

LEVEL 4

36

20%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

121
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

40

18%

LEVEL 2

61

27%

LEVEL 3

69

31%

LEVEL 4

52

23%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

116
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

40

19%

LEVEL 2

60

28%

LEVEL 3

65

30%

LEVEL 4

51

24%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

13
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

6

22%

LEVEL 2

8

30%

LEVEL 3

9

33%

LEVEL 4

4

15%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

5

31%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.