Skip to Content
Main content

PS 31 SAMUEL F DUPONT GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

140
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

14

7%

LEVEL 2

40

21%

LEVEL 3

60

31%

LEVEL 4

80

41%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

173
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

13

6%

LEVEL 2

44

19%

LEVEL 3

67

29%

LEVEL 4

106

46%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

64
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

9

10%

LEVEL 2

19

21%

LEVEL 3

28

30%

LEVEL 4

36

39%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

79
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

10

9%

LEVEL 2

18

17%

LEVEL 3

29

27%

LEVEL 4

50

47%

MALE

PROFICIENT

76
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

5

5%

LEVEL 2

21

21%

LEVEL 3

32

31%

LEVEL 4

44

43%

MALE

PROFICIENT

94
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

26

21%

LEVEL 3

38

31%

LEVEL 4

56

46%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

17
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

2

10%

LEVEL 3

4

20%

LEVEL 4

13

65%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

18
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

1

5%

LEVEL 3

6

30%

LEVEL 4

12

60%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

56
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

13

19%

LEVEL 3

23

33%

LEVEL 4

33

47%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

85
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

4

4%

LEVEL 3

28

31%

LEVEL 4

57

63%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

60
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

10

11%

LEVEL 2

25

26%

LEVEL 3

31

33%

LEVEL 4

29

31%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

61
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

7

7%

LEVEL 2

33

33%

LEVEL 3

28

28%

LEVEL 4

33

33%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

129
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

9

5%

LEVEL 2

27

16%

LEVEL 3

51

31%

LEVEL 4

78

47%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

164
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

9

4%

LEVEL 2

33

16%

LEVEL 3

62

30%

LEVEL 4

102

50%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

5

17%

LEVEL 2

13

45%

LEVEL 3

9

31%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

4

17%

LEVEL 2

11

46%

LEVEL 3

5

21%

LEVEL 4

4

17%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

138
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

14

8%

LEVEL 2

33

18%

LEVEL 3

58

31%

LEVEL 4

80

43%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

170
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

10

5%

LEVEL 2

36

17%

LEVEL 3

64

30%

LEVEL 4

106

49%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

78%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

3

21%

LEVEL 2

8

57%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

8

35%

LEVEL 4

14

61%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

6%

LEVEL 3

14

39%

LEVEL 4

20

56%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

118
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

13

8%

LEVEL 2

40

23%

LEVEL 3

52

30%

LEVEL 4

66

39%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

139
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

13

7%

LEVEL 2

42

22%

LEVEL 3

53

27%

LEVEL 4

86

44%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

120
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

9

6%

LEVEL 2

30

19%

LEVEL 3

51

32%

LEVEL 4

69

43%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

127
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

28

18%

LEVEL 3

48

30%

LEVEL 4

79

49%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

20
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

5

14%

LEVEL 2

10

29%

LEVEL 3

9

26%

LEVEL 4

11

31%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

46
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

8

11%

LEVEL 2

16

23%

LEVEL 3

19

27%

LEVEL 4

27

39%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.