Skip to Content
Main content

PS 11 PURVIS J BEHAN GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

291
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 391

LEVEL 1

26

7%

LEVEL 2

74

19%

LEVEL 3

112

29%

LEVEL 4

179

46%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

278
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

24

7%

LEVEL 2

63

17%

LEVEL 3

106

29%

LEVEL 4

172

47%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

167
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

14

6%

LEVEL 2

35

16%

LEVEL 3

69

32%

LEVEL 4

98

45%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

141
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

12

6%

LEVEL 2

39

20%

LEVEL 3

54

28%

LEVEL 4

87

45%

MALE

PROFICIENT

124
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

12

7%

LEVEL 2

39

22%

LEVEL 3

43

25%

LEVEL 4

81

46%

MALE

PROFICIENT

137
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

12

7%

LEVEL 2

24

14%

LEVEL 3

52

30%

LEVEL 4

85

49%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

21
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

13%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

19

79%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

17
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

6%

LEVEL 3

5

28%

LEVEL 4

12

67%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

26
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

4

13%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

23

74%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

32
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

6%

LEVEL 3

5

15%

LEVEL 4

27

79%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

207
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

20

7%

LEVEL 2

60

21%

LEVEL 3

91

32%

LEVEL 4

116

40%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

190
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

17

7%

LEVEL 2

54

21%

LEVEL 3

78

30%

LEVEL 4

112

43%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

32
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

4

10%

LEVEL 2

6

14%

LEVEL 3

16

38%

LEVEL 4

16

38%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

31
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

6

14%

LEVEL 2

5

12%

LEVEL 3

16

38%

LEVEL 4

15

36%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

283
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

19

5%

LEVEL 2

64

17%

LEVEL 3

107

29%

LEVEL 4

176

48%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

272
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

13

4%

LEVEL 2

57

17%

LEVEL 3

102

30%

LEVEL 4

170

50%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

7

28%

LEVEL 2

10

40%

LEVEL 3

5

20%

LEVEL 4

3

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

11

48%

LEVEL 2

6

26%

LEVEL 3

4

17%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

277
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 359

LEVEL 1

22

6%

LEVEL 2

60

17%

LEVEL 3

105

29%

LEVEL 4

172

48%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

175
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

25

12%

LEVEL 3

54

26%

LEVEL 4

121

59%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

173
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

22

11%

LEVEL 3

47

23%

LEVEL 4

126

63%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

116
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

20

11%

LEVEL 2

49

26%

LEVEL 3

58

31%

LEVEL 4

58

31%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

105
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

18

11%

LEVEL 2

41

25%

LEVEL 3

59

36%

LEVEL 4

46

28%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

278
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 364

LEVEL 1

22

6%

LEVEL 2

64

18%

LEVEL 3

102

28%

LEVEL 4

176

48%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

264
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

22

6%

LEVEL 2

53

16%

LEVEL 3

98

29%

LEVEL 4

166

49%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

13
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

4

15%

LEVEL 2

10

37%

LEVEL 3

10

37%

LEVEL 4

3

11%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

14
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

2

8%

LEVEL 2

10

38%

LEVEL 3

8

31%

LEVEL 4

6

23%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.