PS 8 ROBERT FULTON GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

323
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 449

LEVEL 1

43

10%

LEVEL 2

83

18%

LEVEL 3

150

33%

LEVEL 4

173

39%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

280
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 396

LEVEL 1

41

10%

LEVEL 2

75

19%

LEVEL 3

120

30%

LEVEL 4

160

40%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

157
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

24

11%

LEVEL 2

32

15%

LEVEL 3

78

37%

LEVEL 4

79

37%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

115
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

18

11%

LEVEL 2

34

20%

LEVEL 3

56

34%

LEVEL 4

59

35%

MALE

PROFICIENT

166
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

19

8%

LEVEL 2

51

22%

LEVEL 3

72

31%

LEVEL 4

94

40%

MALE

PROFICIENT

165
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

23

10%

LEVEL 2

41

18%

LEVEL 3

64

28%

LEVEL 4

101

44%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

23
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

23%

LEVEL 3

8

27%

LEVEL 4

15

50%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

30
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

9%

LEVEL 3

11

33%

LEVEL 4

19

58%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

208
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

6

2%

LEVEL 2

39

15%

LEVEL 3

92

36%

LEVEL 4

116

46%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

172
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

9

4%

LEVEL 2

28

13%

LEVEL 3

71

34%

LEVEL 4

101

48%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

24
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

23

33%

LEVEL 2

22

32%

LEVEL 3

15

22%

LEVEL 4

9

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

31
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

20

27%

LEVEL 2

22

30%

LEVEL 3

20

27%

LEVEL 4

11

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

36
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

11

18%

LEVEL 2

15

24%

LEVEL 3

22

35%

LEVEL 4

14

23%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

27
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

11

21%

LEVEL 2

15

28%

LEVEL 3

14

26%

LEVEL 4

13

25%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

298
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 395

LEVEL 1

27

7%

LEVEL 2

70

18%

LEVEL 3

134

34%

LEVEL 4

164

42%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

267
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

25

7%

LEVEL 2

63

18%

LEVEL 3

111

31%

LEVEL 4

156

44%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

25
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

16

30%

LEVEL 2

13

24%

LEVEL 3

16

30%

LEVEL 4

9

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

16

39%

LEVEL 2

12

29%

LEVEL 3

9

22%

LEVEL 4

4

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

317
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 439

LEVEL 1

40

9%

LEVEL 2

82

19%

LEVEL 3

147

33%

LEVEL 4

170

39%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

279
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 388

LEVEL 1

40

10%

LEVEL 2

69

18%

LEVEL 3

120

31%

LEVEL 4

159

41%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

6
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

3

30%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

6

75%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

298
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

14

4%

LEVEL 2

51

14%

LEVEL 3

131

36%

LEVEL 4

167

46%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

240
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

14

5%

LEVEL 2

47

16%

LEVEL 3

91

30%

LEVEL 4

149

50%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

29

34%

LEVEL 2

32

37%

LEVEL 3

19

22%

LEVEL 4

6

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

27

28%

LEVEL 2

28

29%

LEVEL 3

29

31%

LEVEL 4

11

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

321
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 441

LEVEL 1

40

9%

LEVEL 2

80

18%

LEVEL 3

149

34%

LEVEL 4

172

39%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

278
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 391

LEVEL 1

40

10%

LEVEL 2

73

19%

LEVEL 3

119

30%

LEVEL 4

159

41%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.