Skip to Content
Main content

PS 195 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

77
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 452

LEVEL 1

271

60%

LEVEL 2

104

23%

LEVEL 3

59

13%

LEVEL 4

18

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

102
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 421

LEVEL 1

209

50%

LEVEL 2

110

26%

LEVEL 3

70

17%

LEVEL 4

32

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

39
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

130

59%

LEVEL 2

51

23%

LEVEL 3

31

14%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

46
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

93

47%

LEVEL 2

57

29%

LEVEL 3

33

17%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

38
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

141

61%

LEVEL 2

53

23%

LEVEL 3

28

12%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

56
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

116

52%

LEVEL 2

53

24%

LEVEL 3

37

16%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

6

50%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

7

54%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

48

64%

LEVEL 2

17

23%

LEVEL 3

7

9%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

22

46%

LEVEL 2

12

25%

LEVEL 3

9

19%

LEVEL 4

5

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

64
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

211

59%

LEVEL 2

80

23%

LEVEL 3

49

14%

LEVEL 4

15

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

86
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

175

50%

LEVEL 2

92

26%

LEVEL 3

59

17%

LEVEL 4

27

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

71
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

185

54%

LEVEL 2

86

25%

LEVEL 3

55

16%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

94
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

127

40%

LEVEL 2

93

30%

LEVEL 3

64

20%

LEVEL 4

30

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

86

78%

LEVEL 2

18

16%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

82

77%

LEVEL 2

17

16%

LEVEL 3

6

6%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

63
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

164

53%

LEVEL 2

84

27%

LEVEL 3

48

15%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

94
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

118

40%

LEVEL 2

80

27%

LEVEL 3

63

22%

LEVEL 4

31

11%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

14
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

107

76%

LEVEL 2

20

14%

LEVEL 3

11

8%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

8
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

91

71%

LEVEL 2

30

23%

LEVEL 3

7

5%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

17

68%

LEVEL 2

5

20%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

22

52%

LEVEL 2

10

24%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

7

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

74
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 427

LEVEL 1

254

59%

LEVEL 2

99

23%

LEVEL 3

58

14%

LEVEL 4

16

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

92
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

187

49%

LEVEL 2

100

26%

LEVEL 3

67

18%

LEVEL 4

25

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

57
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

196

59%

LEVEL 2

79

24%

LEVEL 3

45

14%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

76
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

160

49%

LEVEL 2

88

27%

LEVEL 3

50

15%

LEVEL 4

26

8%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

20
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

75

63%

LEVEL 2

25

21%

LEVEL 3

14

12%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

26
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

49

51%

LEVEL 2

22

23%

LEVEL 3

20

21%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.