Skip to Content
Main content

PS 121 THROOP GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

143
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 456

LEVEL 1

201

44%

LEVEL 2

112

25%

LEVEL 3

95

21%

LEVEL 4

48

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

152
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 414

LEVEL 1

166

40%

LEVEL 2

96

23%

LEVEL 3

81

20%

LEVEL 4

71

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

74
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

101

43%

LEVEL 2

61

26%

LEVEL 3

46

19%

LEVEL 4

28

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

69
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

75

38%

LEVEL 2

51

26%

LEVEL 3

39

20%

LEVEL 4

30

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

69
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

100

45%

LEVEL 2

51

23%

LEVEL 3

49

22%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

83
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

91

42%

LEVEL 2

45

21%

LEVEL 3

42

19%

LEVEL 4

41

19%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

16
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

7

25%

LEVEL 2

5

18%

LEVEL 3

10

36%

LEVEL 4

6

21%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

28
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

6

15%

LEVEL 2

5

13%

LEVEL 3

11

28%

LEVEL 4

17

44%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

77
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

128

47%

LEVEL 2

70

25%

LEVEL 3

55

20%

LEVEL 4

22

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

76
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

105

45%

LEVEL 2

52

22%

LEVEL 3

45

19%

LEVEL 4

31

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

39
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

59

46%

LEVEL 2

31

24%

LEVEL 3

27

21%

LEVEL 4

12

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

38
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

47

39%

LEVEL 2

36

30%

LEVEL 3

21

17%

LEVEL 4

17

14%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

140
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 370

LEVEL 1

131

35%

LEVEL 2

99

27%

LEVEL 3

93

25%

LEVEL 4

47

13%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

146
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

109

32%

LEVEL 2

87

25%

LEVEL 3

76

22%

LEVEL 4

70

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

70

81%

LEVEL 2

13

15%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

57

79%

LEVEL 2

9

13%

LEVEL 3

5

7%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

139
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 427

LEVEL 1

180

42%

LEVEL 2

108

25%

LEVEL 3

92

22%

LEVEL 4

47

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

145
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 391

LEVEL 1

155

40%

LEVEL 2

91

23%

LEVEL 3

75

19%

LEVEL 4

70

18%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

21

72%

LEVEL 2

4

14%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

11

48%

LEVEL 2

5

22%

LEVEL 3

6

26%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

68
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

45

31%

LEVEL 2

31

22%

LEVEL 3

43

30%

LEVEL 4

25

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

38

31%

LEVEL 2

33

27%

LEVEL 3

24

19%

LEVEL 4

29

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

75
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

156

50%

LEVEL 2

81

26%

LEVEL 3

52

17%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

99
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

128

44%

LEVEL 2

63

22%

LEVEL 3

57

20%

LEVEL 4

42

14%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

131
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 410

LEVEL 1

178

43%

LEVEL 2

101

25%

LEVEL 3

87

21%

LEVEL 4

44

11%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

142
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 381

LEVEL 1

152

40%

LEVEL 2

87

23%

LEVEL 3

75

20%

LEVEL 4

67

18%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

12
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

23

50%

LEVEL 2

11

24%

LEVEL 3

8

17%

LEVEL 4

4

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

10
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

14

42%

LEVEL 2

9

27%

LEVEL 3

6

18%

LEVEL 4

4

12%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.