Skip to Content
Main content

PS 41 GUN HILL ROAD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

177
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 455

LEVEL 1

198

44%

LEVEL 2

80

18%

LEVEL 3

100

22%

LEVEL 4

77

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

172
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 450

LEVEL 1

173

38%

LEVEL 2

105

23%

LEVEL 3

100

22%

LEVEL 4

72

16%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

93
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

115

47%

LEVEL 2

37

15%

LEVEL 3

57

23%

LEVEL 4

36

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

96
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

84

36%

LEVEL 2

53

23%

LEVEL 3

56

24%

LEVEL 4

40

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

84
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

83

40%

LEVEL 2

43

20%

LEVEL 3

43

20%

LEVEL 4

41

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

76
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

89

41%

LEVEL 2

52

24%

LEVEL 3

44

20%

LEVEL 4

32

15%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

4

40%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

4

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

88
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

112

48%

LEVEL 2

35

15%

LEVEL 3

50

21%

LEVEL 4

38

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

83
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

91

39%

LEVEL 2

59

25%

LEVEL 3

54

23%

LEVEL 4

29

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

78
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

83

41%

LEVEL 2

41

20%

LEVEL 3

43

21%

LEVEL 4

35

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

79
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

77

39%

LEVEL 2

40

20%

LEVEL 3

43

22%

LEVEL 4

36

18%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

163
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

150

40%

LEVEL 2

66

17%

LEVEL 3

93

25%

LEVEL 4

70

18%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

159
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 364

LEVEL 1

112

31%

LEVEL 2

93

26%

LEVEL 3

90

25%

LEVEL 4

69

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

48

63%

LEVEL 2

14

18%

LEVEL 3

7

9%

LEVEL 4

7

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

61

71%

LEVEL 2

12

14%

LEVEL 3

10

12%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

166
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 403

LEVEL 1

165

41%

LEVEL 2

72

18%

LEVEL 3

91

23%

LEVEL 4

75

19%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

168
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 394

LEVEL 1

133

34%

LEVEL 2

93

24%

LEVEL 3

97

25%

LEVEL 4

71

18%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

11
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

33

63%

LEVEL 2

8

15%

LEVEL 3

9

17%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

40

71%

LEVEL 2

12

21%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

60%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

4

25%

LEVEL 2

4

25%

LEVEL 3

5

31%

LEVEL 4

3

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

172
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 450

LEVEL 1

198

44%

LEVEL 2

80

18%

LEVEL 3

97

22%

LEVEL 4

75

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

164
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 434

LEVEL 1

169

39%

LEVEL 2

101

23%

LEVEL 3

95

22%

LEVEL 4

69

16%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

154
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

150

41%

LEVEL 2

61

17%

LEVEL 3

84

23%

LEVEL 4

70

19%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

153
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

133

36%

LEVEL 2

87

23%

LEVEL 3

90

24%

LEVEL 4

63

17%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

23
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

48

53%

LEVEL 2

19

21%

LEVEL 3

16

18%

LEVEL 4

7

8%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

19
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

40

52%

LEVEL 2

18

23%

LEVEL 3

10

13%

LEVEL 4

9

12%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.