Skip to Content
Main content

PS 68 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

122
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

101

31%

LEVEL 2

103

32%

LEVEL 3

81

25%

LEVEL 4

41

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

160
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

91

27%

LEVEL 2

86

26%

LEVEL 3

97

29%

LEVEL 4

63

19%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

67
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

37

24%

LEVEL 2

52

33%

LEVEL 3

45

29%

LEVEL 4

22

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

86
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

39

23%

LEVEL 2

43

26%

LEVEL 3

55

33%

LEVEL 4

31

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

55
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

64

38%

LEVEL 2

51

30%

LEVEL 3

36

21%

LEVEL 4

19

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

74
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

52

31%

LEVEL 2

43

25%

LEVEL 3

42

25%

LEVEL 4

32

19%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

89
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

80

31%

LEVEL 2

91

35%

LEVEL 3

59

23%

LEVEL 4

30

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

115
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

71

27%

LEVEL 2

79

30%

LEVEL 3

70

26%

LEVEL 4

45

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

27
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

18

33%

LEVEL 2

9

17%

LEVEL 3

18

33%

LEVEL 4

9

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

40
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

15

25%

LEVEL 2

6

10%

LEVEL 3

25

41%

LEVEL 4

15

25%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

114
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

54

21%

LEVEL 2

88

34%

LEVEL 3

77

30%

LEVEL 4

37

14%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

147
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

50

19%

LEVEL 2

70

26%

LEVEL 3

92

34%

LEVEL 4

55

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

47

67%

LEVEL 2

15

21%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

41

59%

LEVEL 2

16

23%

LEVEL 3

5

7%

LEVEL 4

8

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

20

19%

LEVEL 2

44

42%

LEVEL 3

27

25%

LEVEL 4

15

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

66
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

20

18%

LEVEL 2

25

23%

LEVEL 3

38

34%

LEVEL 4

28

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

80
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

81

37%

LEVEL 2

59

27%

LEVEL 3

54

25%

LEVEL 4

26

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

94
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

71

31%

LEVEL 2

61

27%

LEVEL 3

59

26%

LEVEL 4

35

15%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

112
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

88

30%

LEVEL 2

96

32%

LEVEL 3

74

25%

LEVEL 4

38

13%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

147
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

82

27%

LEVEL 2

76

25%

LEVEL 3

87

29%

LEVEL 4

60

20%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

10
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

13

43%

LEVEL 2

7

23%

LEVEL 3

7

23%

LEVEL 4

3

10%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

13
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

9

28%

LEVEL 2

10

31%

LEVEL 3

10

31%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.