PS 76 BENNINGTON SCHOOL (THE) GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

88
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 491

LEVEL 1

268

55%

LEVEL 2

135

27%

LEVEL 3

67

14%

LEVEL 4

21

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

69
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 455

LEVEL 1

236

52%

LEVEL 2

150

33%

LEVEL 3

50

11%

LEVEL 4

19

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

39
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

132

56%

LEVEL 2

64

27%

LEVEL 3

30

13%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

25
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

110

51%

LEVEL 2

81

38%

LEVEL 3

21

10%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

49
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

136

53%

LEVEL 2

71

28%

LEVEL 3

37

14%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

44
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

126

53%

LEVEL 2

69

29%

LEVEL 3

29

12%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

4

33%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

3

25%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

5

50%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

7
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

20

61%

LEVEL 2

6

18%

LEVEL 3

5

15%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

9
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

17

47%

LEVEL 2

10

28%

LEVEL 3

6

17%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

35
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

134

55%

LEVEL 2

76

31%

LEVEL 3

28

11%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

26
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

115

55%

LEVEL 2

70

33%

LEVEL 3

19

9%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

38
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

106

55%

LEVEL 2

49

25%

LEVEL 3

29

15%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

30
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

97

51%

LEVEL 2

63

33%

LEVEL 3

24

13%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

85
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 415

LEVEL 1

208

50%

LEVEL 2

122

29%

LEVEL 3

64

15%

LEVEL 4

21

5%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

67
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

172

46%

LEVEL 2

134

36%

LEVEL 3

49

13%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

60

79%

LEVEL 2

13

17%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

64

78%

LEVEL 2

16

20%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

84
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 428

LEVEL 1

223

52%

LEVEL 2

121

28%

LEVEL 3

63

15%

LEVEL 4

21

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

66
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 389

LEVEL 1

186

48%

LEVEL 2

137

35%

LEVEL 3

48

12%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

45

71%

LEVEL 2

14

22%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

50

76%

LEVEL 2

13

20%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

52

43%

LEVEL 2

42

35%

LEVEL 3

20

17%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

44

42%

LEVEL 2

38

37%

LEVEL 3

15

14%

LEVEL 4

7

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 370

LEVEL 1

216

58%

LEVEL 2

93

25%

LEVEL 3

47

13%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

192

55%

LEVEL 2

112

32%

LEVEL 3

35

10%

LEVEL 4

12

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

86
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 439

LEVEL 1

233

53%

LEVEL 2

120

27%

LEVEL 3

65

15%

LEVEL 4

21

5%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

66
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 405

LEVEL 1

202

50%

LEVEL 2

137

34%

LEVEL 3

48

12%

LEVEL 4

18

4%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

35

67%

LEVEL 2

15

29%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

34

68%

LEVEL 2

13

26%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.