Skip to Content
Main content

PS 96 RICHARD RODGERS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

173
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 469

LEVEL 1

160

34%

LEVEL 2

136

29%

LEVEL 3

122

26%

LEVEL 4

51

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

124
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 432

LEVEL 1

190

44%

LEVEL 2

118

27%

LEVEL 3

93

22%

LEVEL 4

31

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

80
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

82

35%

LEVEL 2

73

31%

LEVEL 3

59

25%

LEVEL 4

21

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

67
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

95

44%

LEVEL 2

52

24%

LEVEL 3

51

24%

LEVEL 4

16

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

93
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

78

33%

LEVEL 2

63

27%

LEVEL 3

63

27%

LEVEL 4

30

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

57
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

95

44%

LEVEL 2

66

30%

LEVEL 3

42

19%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

13
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

3

15%

LEVEL 2

4

20%

LEVEL 3

9

45%

LEVEL 4

4

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

26
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

13

27%

LEVEL 2

10

20%

LEVEL 3

17

35%

LEVEL 4

9

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

24
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

13

28%

LEVEL 2

10

21%

LEVEL 3

16

34%

LEVEL 4

8

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

23
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

51

47%

LEVEL 2

35

32%

LEVEL 3

17

16%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

17
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

50

51%

LEVEL 2

31

32%

LEVEL 3

13

13%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

105
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

92

32%

LEVEL 2

87

31%

LEVEL 3

74

26%

LEVEL 4

31

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

70
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

117

45%

LEVEL 2

74

28%

LEVEL 3

56

21%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

157
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 370

LEVEL 1

99

27%

LEVEL 2

114

31%

LEVEL 3

107

29%

LEVEL 4

50

14%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

118
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

126

37%

LEVEL 2

100

29%

LEVEL 3

89

26%

LEVEL 4

29

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

61

62%

LEVEL 2

22

22%

LEVEL 3

15

15%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

64

73%

LEVEL 2

18

20%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

161
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 415

LEVEL 1

126

30%

LEVEL 2

128

31%

LEVEL 3

113

27%

LEVEL 4

48

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

122
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 396

LEVEL 1

163

41%

LEVEL 2

111

28%

LEVEL 3

92

23%

LEVEL 4

30

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

12
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

34

63%

LEVEL 2

8

15%

LEVEL 3

9

17%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

27

75%

LEVEL 2

7

19%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

22

24%

LEVEL 2

29

32%

LEVEL 3

23

25%

LEVEL 4

17

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

31

34%

LEVEL 2

21

23%

LEVEL 3

29

32%

LEVEL 4

11

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

133
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 378

LEVEL 1

138

37%

LEVEL 2

107

28%

LEVEL 3

99

26%

LEVEL 4

34

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

84
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

159

47%

LEVEL 2

97

29%

LEVEL 3

64

19%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

152
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 402

LEVEL 1

134

33%

LEVEL 2

116

29%

LEVEL 3

106

26%

LEVEL 4

46

11%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

114
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

162

43%

LEVEL 2

100

27%

LEVEL 3

85

23%

LEVEL 4

29

8%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

21
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

26

39%

LEVEL 2

20

30%

LEVEL 3

16

24%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

10
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

28

50%

LEVEL 2

18

32%

LEVEL 3

8

14%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.