PS 103 HECTOR FONTANEZ GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

122
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 570

LEVEL 1

316

55%

LEVEL 2

132

23%

LEVEL 3

86

15%

LEVEL 4

36

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

154
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 529

LEVEL 1

230

43%

LEVEL 2

145

27%

LEVEL 3

109

21%

LEVEL 4

45

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

64
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

166

56%

LEVEL 2

66

22%

LEVEL 3

43

15%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

75
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

121

47%

LEVEL 2

64

25%

LEVEL 3

57

22%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

58
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

150

55%

LEVEL 2

66

24%

LEVEL 3

43

16%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

79
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

109

41%

LEVEL 2

81

30%

LEVEL 3

52

19%

LEVEL 4

27

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

5
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

11

55%

LEVEL 2

4

20%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

3

15%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

5
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

10

59%

LEVEL 2

2

12%

LEVEL 3

2

12%

LEVEL 4

3

18%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

9

56%

LEVEL 2

3

19%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

5
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

5

33%

LEVEL 2

5

33%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

69
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

156

53%

LEVEL 2

71

24%

LEVEL 3

49

17%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

88
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

101

38%

LEVEL 2

74

28%

LEVEL 3

65

25%

LEVEL 4

23

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

41
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

133

59%

LEVEL 2

52

23%

LEVEL 3

30

13%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

48
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

106

49%

LEVEL 2

63

29%

LEVEL 3

32

15%

LEVEL 4

16

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

118
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 459

LEVEL 1

223

49%

LEVEL 2

118

26%

LEVEL 3

83

18%

LEVEL 4

35

8%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

145
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 419

LEVEL 1

150

36%

LEVEL 2

124

30%

LEVEL 3

103

25%

LEVEL 4

42

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

93

84%

LEVEL 2

14

13%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

80

73%

LEVEL 2

21

19%

LEVEL 3

6

5%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

119
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 472

LEVEL 1

229

49%

LEVEL 2

124

26%

LEVEL 3

83

18%

LEVEL 4

36

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

144
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 417

LEVEL 1

156

37%

LEVEL 2

117

28%

LEVEL 3

103

25%

LEVEL 4

41

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

87

89%

LEVEL 2

8

8%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

10
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

74

66%

LEVEL 2

28

25%

LEVEL 3

6

5%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

30

41%

LEVEL 2

22

30%

LEVEL 3

14

19%

LEVEL 4

8

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

24

36%

LEVEL 2

18

27%

LEVEL 3

16

24%

LEVEL 4

9

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

100
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 496

LEVEL 1

286

58%

LEVEL 2

110

22%

LEVEL 3

72

15%

LEVEL 4

28

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

129
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 462

LEVEL 1

206

45%

LEVEL 2

127

27%

LEVEL 3

93

20%

LEVEL 4

36

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

107
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 499

LEVEL 1

278

56%

LEVEL 2

114

23%

LEVEL 3

75

15%

LEVEL 4

32

6%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

142
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 477

LEVEL 1

202

42%

LEVEL 2

133

28%

LEVEL 3

101

21%

LEVEL 4

41

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

15
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

38

54%

LEVEL 2

18

25%

LEVEL 3

11

15%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

12
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

28

54%

LEVEL 2

12

23%

LEVEL 3

8

15%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.